The NOTICE file has copyright 2007 in it. That's pretty outdated at this point.
On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 16:38, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
> Why? I have never referenced gitbox in any of the Log4j releases. As far as I
> am concerned https://github.com/apache is an ASF repo.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On May 1,
OK. Release-2.x does run fine on Java 11. But 3.0 will simplify some things,
although it appears the build won’t be one of them.
Ralph
> On May 1, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Minor comment: Now that IBM provides Java 11 on the i Series, I suspect
> that I will see more interest
Why? I have never referenced gitbox in any of the Log4j releases. As far as I
am concerned https://github.com/apache is an ASF repo.
Ralph
> On May 1, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> FYI the repo of record should be an Apache repo, not a GitHub repo.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Sat, May
Minor comment: Now that IBM provides Java 11 on the i Series, I suspect
that I will see more interest from my day job about Java 11 since for us
Java everyone must include IBM hardware.
Gary
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 03:14 Ralph Goers wrote:
> I just thought I would update you that I have created
FYI the repo of record should be an Apache repo, not a GitHub repo.
Gary
On Sat, May 1, 2021, 17:07 Robert Middleton wrote:
> This is a vote to release log4cxx 0.12.0. This is RC2. This vote
> supersedes the original vote.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j
This is a vote to release log4cxx 0.12.0. This is RC2. This vote
supersedes the original vote.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
As we had some issues with people building and running last time,
Yes of course, pardon my typo, I meant NOT...
Gary
On Sat, May 1, 2021, 16:02 Ralph Goers wrote:
> It does NOT require the boards attention.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On May 1, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > JPMS: Worth mentioning FTR as a growing pain but requiring board
> attention.
It does NOT require the boards attention.
Ralph
> On May 1, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> JPMS: Worth mentioning FTR as a growing pain but requiring board attention.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021, 13:11 Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> Not sure it is worth mentioning in the board
JPMS: Worth mentioning FTR as a growing pain but requiring board attention.
Gary
On Sat, May 1, 2021, 13:11 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Not sure it is worth mentioning in the board report but I have been
> working on getting Log4j master to fully support JPMS without a lot of
> success.
>
> Ralph
>
>
Not sure it is worth mentioning in the board report but I have been working on
getting Log4j master to fully support JPMS without a lot of success.
Ralph
> On May 1, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Hey all, it’s that time of year again! Please share a list of
> accomplishments,
Hey all, it’s that time of year again! Please share a list of
accomplishments, kudos, plans, etc, for use in this quarter’s board report.
I have stats and such generated, so this is more of a narrative explanation
of what’s going on. I’ll also review the recent list activity for anything
that’s
11 matches
Mail list logo
