Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-13 Thread Scott Deboy
Hey great - yeah I'll go through and add some tickets. The event routing mechanism is very simple - you define an expression using the logging event attribute names, and the values in the logging event are used to convert that expression into a concrete tab name, where the events are routed.

Re: [chainsaw] What is necessary for a 2.2 release?

2023-10-13 Thread Robert Middleton
For those of you who didn't see on slack: I did update Chainsaw last night so you can load/save receivers. That brings Chainsaw back into a usable state(in my mind at least). I need to check to ensure that everything gets saved properly, but that shouldn't be too hard. Scott, would you mind

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Ralph Goers
Nevermind. I was using the wrong url. Ralph > On Oct 13, 2023, at 8:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I get a 404 trying to access the log4j2 staging web site. Although > technically not required for a release I am not comfortable voting for the > release without being able to see the web site.

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Ralph Goers
I get a 404 trying to access the log4j2 staging web site. Although technically not required for a release I am not comfortable voting for the release without being able to see the web site. Ralph > On Oct 13, 2023, at 6:46 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > On Fri, 13 Oct

Re: [site] Jekyll proposal (in branch)

2023-10-13 Thread Ralph Goers
I am getting a 404 trying to access https://logging.staged.apache.org. Ralph > On Oct 12, 2023, at 9:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > I made the Jekyll branch work with the staging environment: > https://logging.staged.apache.org/ > > When you change something in the sources,

Re: Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Christian, On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:46, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Why is content not causing this issue? > For me both is possible, just trying to understand the best way. >From what I understand, if a branch (in any repo) has a configuration: staging: whoami: name_of_the_branch

Re: [PR] Bump com.github.spotbugs:spotbugs-annotations from 4.7.3 to 4.8.0 [logging-log4j-jmx-gui]

2023-10-13 Thread via GitHub
vy merged PR #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jmx-gui/pull/1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [site] Jekyll proposal (in branch)

2023-10-13 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
The current version is certainly way simpler than before, I liked it. I agree with moving every "data" (members, projects, etc.) to its own data file. I still prefer all typesetting performed in AsciiDoc. (I am not telling you to do so immediately. But that is where I'd like this initiative to

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j Scala 13.0.0 released

2023-10-13 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Apache Log4j Scala team is pleased to announce the 13.0.0 release. This project provides a Scala-friendly interface to log against the Log4j API. For further information (support, download, etc.) see the project website[1]. [1] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/scala === Release Notes The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Scala 13.0.0

2023-10-13 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Adding my +1. With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from Piotr, Matt, and me. I will continue the release process. On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:21 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Scala 13.0.0. > > Website:

Staging website (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0)

2023-10-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> [1] Christian's recent Jekyll experiment on the `asf-staging` branch >> of `logging-site` repository confused the INFRA and it is acting >> strangely. This will *NOT* be an issue when we push the website >> changes to production, i.e., `asf-site` branch. Though we will try >> fixing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0

2023-10-13 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi all, On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 12:16, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > ✔ Binaries > ✔ Sources > ✔ Website (incl. Javadocs) > Ă Website URL[1] > ✔ Signatures > ✔ Checksums > > +1 Same here: * the binaries in the binary archive, Maven repo and locally generated are identical. Somehow `log4j-perf` made

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0

2023-10-13 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
✔ Binaries ✔ Sources ✔ Website (incl. Javadocs) Ă Website URL[1] ✔ Signatures ✔ Checksums +1 Thanks for taking care of the release Christian! [1] Christian's recent Jekyll experiment on the `asf-staging` branch of `logging-site` repository confused the INFRA and it is acting strangely. This

[VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.21.0

2023-10-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j 2.21.0. Website: https://logging-log4j.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/ GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2 Commit: 493d9a9daabc72d10582c4682538baa93a2a Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j Nexus: