Github user leventov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
@remkop I did that for log4j-core only. Yes, it passes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user remkop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
Do all tests pass when you run `mvn clean install` on your machine? (may
take ~20 minutes)
On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 12:34 AM, Roman Leventov
wrote:
Github user leventov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
@remkop this test used to depend on specific line numbers in this test.
Made it more generic.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user leventov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
@remkop thanks for review. Replaced custom class in ThreadLocal with
`Object[]`. Fixed a bug in `TextEncoderHelper`,
`ThrowableProxyTest.testCircularSuppressedExceptions()` passes now.
---
Github user remkop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
Apologies for the delay. I now have some time to start looking at this
again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user remkop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
@leventov Quick update: Started to look at the PR but did not get far yet.
I'm taking my time because this is a fairly sensitive area. When converting the
OutputStreamAppender and
Github user leventov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/71
> A complicating factor is that there may be users who subclassed any of
these classes, and we don't want to break their stuff.
If users could implement `ByteBufferDestination`,