My +1
Dominic, if you are going to vote you need to do it formally.
Ralph
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 12:57 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> Knowing that those changes are intentional I am confident that the next
> release is better than the last. This is reason enough to move on. If
> something
I'll have time to review the release over the weekend. I'm going on
PTO starting this weekend, too, so I'll likely be doing stuff here a
few random days over the next couple weeks, too.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 02:57, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> Knowing that those changes are intentional I am
Knowing that those changes are intentional I am confident that the next
release is better than the last. This is reason enough to move on. If
something breaks we can still address those issues with another future
release.
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
Hi Dominik
I have had a long look over the changes (both via the PR and locally, as I
contributed to help with some infra changes) and I'm happy -- there's been a
lot of clean-up and simplification and in addition, tests are now run against
all targets -- so that's a good thing. Some of these
Hi
Sorry to not have responded earlier. Time is short and the days are busy. I
looked at the diff and found several suspicious changes. Several hundred
ifdefs have been removed/replaced along with tests. Therefore I have a bad
feeling about those changes without further careful checking. I
Hi
Sorry to be a bother, but I haven't heard anything back on this apart from
Dominik's inquiry into netstandard 1.3 support. I'd really like to get this out
as:
a) it contains the CVE fix that has been asked about so much
b) it solves some issues affecting netstandard users
Thanks
-d
On
