On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 07:00:56AM +0200, VOITPTRPTR wrote:
How one can contribute (I'm a C developer) to Lucy?
We have a wiki page up that covers the mechanics of contributing:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/HowToContribute
Most people choose what they want to work on based on what they
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Lucy Wiki for change
notification.
The HowToContribute page has been changed by MarvinHumphrey.
The comment on this change is: Remove mention of an obsolete C89 requirement..
Hi Marvin,
We have a wiki page up that covers the mechanics of contributing:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/HowToContribute
Excellent. I'll checkout the code and start reading on monday!
Most people choose what they want to work on based on what they need or what
interests them. Since you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Karman updated LUCY-114:
--
Attachment: align_signature.patch
The inline patch came out garbled. Same patch attached.
compile
nullable attribute not propagated
-
Key: LUCY-115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-115
Project: Lucy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Clownfish
Environment: OS X 10.6
Build.PL opts not supported
---
Key: LUCY-116
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-116
Project: Lucy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Perl bindings
Environment: OS X 10.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Karman updated LUCY-116:
--
Attachment: get_cc.patch
pass_cc.patch
The attached patches implement the documented
Hi Koji,
- FieldCacheImpl.getStringIndex() no longer throws an exception when
term count exceeds doc count.
I think it is LUCENE-2142, but after it was fixed, getStringIndex() still
throws
AIOOBE? Am I missing something?
I have seen you wrote a comment to 2142 on June 7, we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2142:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2142-fix.patch
After a coffee i have seen the problem, too - stupoid :(
(10/06/19 15:36), Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Koji,
- FieldCacheImpl.getStringIndex() no longer throws an exception when
term count exceeds doc count.
I think it is LUCENE-2142, but after it was fixed, getStringIndex() still
throws
AIOOBE? Am I missing something?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2142:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2142-fix.patch)
FieldCache.getStringIndex should not throw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2142:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2142-fix-3x.patch
LUCENE-2142-fix-trunk.patch
Here patch
Mike, Koji: The release is out, but should I maybe simple remove the
announcement line (simply strike it out) on the lucene.apache.org pages, so
nobody expects this to be fixed really?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
OK, I think just removing the text claiming this is fixed, is good?
Mike
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Mike, Koji: The release is out, but should I maybe simple remove the
announcement line (simply strike it out) on the lucene.apache.org pages, so
It will not disappear in changes.txt, but at least it should not be so
prominent.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Saturday,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2380:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2380_direct_arr_access.patch
This patch adds the ability to get at the raw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880483#action_12880483
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2380:
--
It was really tricky performance testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880490#action_12880490
]
Simon Rosenthal commented on SOLR-1911:
---
No - seems to have cleared up with trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1965:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1965.patch
Here's the patch for facet.method=fc (single valued) that uses the latest
sorting performance regression
--
Key: LUCENE-2504
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2504
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880541#action_12880541
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2504:
--
More numbers: Ubuntu, Java 1.7.0-ea-b98 (64
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880542#action_12880542
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2504:
--
More numbers: Windows 7:
java version
Chewing up cpu or blocked. The stack trace says it's blocked.
The sockets are abandoned by the program, yes, but TCP/IP itself has a
complex sequence for shutting down sockets that takes a few minutes.
If these sockets stay around for hours, then there's a real problem.
(In fact, there is a bug
23 matches
Mail list logo