Hi,
I just wanted to package the new HBase version and since I've just recently
read about a malicious software tarball for some Linux IRC server[1], I got
back to the habbit of checking signatures. (Yes, I was lazy recently. I'm
ashamed.)
But checking the signatures of apache software
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1, again.
Thank you Mike and Christian for your votes.
We are still missing one PMC vote in order to release these artifacts.
Grant ?
Andi..
Mike
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882520#action_12882520
]
David Sitsky commented on LUCENE-2511:
--
Uwe, that all sounds good, except I never
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882530#action_12882530
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2511:
Did you mean Lucene 2.4.1?
If
Robert Muir:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
But checking the signatures of apache software obviously is meaningless,
since
apache developers appears to not have their keys in the web-of-trust.
From three signature files I had laying around on my hard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved SOLR-1934.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.4.1
(was: Next)
Resolution: Fixed
branch-1.4 should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2514:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2514-MTQPagedBytes.patch
This patch only adds a correct trim to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882422#action_12882422
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2514 at 6/25/10 10:09 AM:
Is it because you are using JDK 1.6 on your shiny new mac? You have to use 1.5
FWIW, Mahout is going to a single static page plus Confluence for it's website
(http://robinanil.com/website/), much like OFBiz. Just saying...
On Jun 25, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
I'm having
Does anyone understand why Forrest is so picky about the JVM? This is
counterintuitive in the extreme.
Karl
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ext Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:17 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Yeah, yeah - like 10 people mentioned I should be using java 1.5 - I
know, I know - I've done the site building many times - I've futzed with
forrest (which I hate and think is crap) many times :)
Turns it out was because you have to run some target (I did test) first
to get a Forrest file into
It uses sun. internal classes.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wri...@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:19 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
It's because it uses sun package private stuff that's not in 1.6.
I think there is a jira issue and patch for it, but Forrest is basically
dead dev wise from what I can tell. I hope we move off it.
- Mark
On 6/25/10 10:19 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Does anyone understand why Forrest is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882591#action_12882591
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2514:
---
+1
Change Term to use bytes
Can a solr/maven dude look at this? I simply used the copy command on
the release to-do wiki (sounds like it should be updated).
If no one steps up, I'll try and straighten it out later.
On 6/25/10 10:28 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
Congrats on the release!
Something seems to be wrong with solr
Expose ExecutorService in ParallelMultiSearcher
---
Key: LUCENE-2515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2515
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rocco Verhoef updated LUCENE-2515:
--
Component/s: Search
Expose ExecutorService in ParallelMultiSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-2515.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of LUCENE-2440.
Expose ExecutorService in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2506:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.2)
A Stateful Filter That Works Across Index Segments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2368:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.3)
Affects Version/s: 3.0.2
2.9.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1698:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
(was: 3.0)
Change backwards-compatibility policy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882641#action_12882641
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1698:
Is that issue still relevant? In light of the
Hi,
I have an index directory that I update daily via a process that invokes
IndexWriter.updateDocument(). The daily update will be mostly adds but some
changes to existing documents.
In this scenario, how are the index files modified? Is it the case that all
mods will be either the creation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2514:
Attachment: LUCENE-2514.patch
ok i added a couple more optimizations to preflex, to avoid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karthick Sankarachary updated LUCENE-2506:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2506.patch)
A Stateful Filter That Works Across
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881502#action_12881502
]
Karthick Sankarachary edited comment on LUCENE-2348 at 6/25/10 4:08 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karthick Sankarachary updated LUCENE-2506:
--
Description:
By design, Lucene's Filter abstraction is applied once per
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
It's because it uses sun package private stuff that's not in 1.6.
I think there is a jira issue and patch for it, but Forrest is basically
dead dev wise from what I can tell. I hope we move off it.
Yep, it definitely
+1, die, forrest, die!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:16 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882720#action_12882720
]
Karthick Sankarachary commented on LUCENE-2348:
---
Trejkaz,
Can you please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Kanarsky updated SOLR-1264:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1264-additional.patch
The original problem still exists if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2514:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2514.patch
Converted the rest of TestSurrogates (removed FieldAnText
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-2373:
--
Summary: Create a Codec to work with streaming and append-only filesystems
(was:
On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
i just got a new mac too, and it doesn't support java 5, so lets [lucene,
too!] please move away from forrest!!!
You can get and install java 1.5 on snow leopard. I don't remember what I did
to get it. Found it via google.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-2373:
--
Attachment: appending.patch
This patch contains an implementation of AppendingCodec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882782#action_12882782
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2373:
-
{quote}
Note 2: o.a.l.index.codecs.* doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882791#action_12882791
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-2373:
---
Yup, I used @lucene.experimental in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882796#action_12882796
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2373:
-
Cool, I think @lucene.internal would be good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2514:
Attachment: LUCENE-2514.patch
Thanks Uwe. I added some additional changes:
* naive switch of
Add LimitTokenCountFilterFactory
Key: SOLR-1974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1974
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Schema and Analysis
Reporter: Koji
I've Googled around a bit and came across this:
http://markmail.org/message/l67bierbmmedrfw5. Apparently, there's a long
standing bug against SUN since May 2006 (
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6431344) that's still open and
reports the exact same behavior that I'm seeing.
If I understand
Dennis,
That's a u...@lucene question.
Update does delete followed by an add.
A delete just marks a document as deleted. In other words, it modifies
previously created index files.
Additions add new files. Once certain thresholds are reached, an add will
trigger a segment merge, which will
42 matches
Mail list logo
