As I understand it, only the official Lucene.NET committers (DIGY, George
Aroush, and Doug Sale) can commit alterations to the web site or the source.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:04 PM
To:
indeed. Learning as I go.
From: neal.granr...@thermofisher.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:32:53 -0700
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-379) Clean up Lucene.Net website
As I understand it, only the official Lucene.NET committers (DIGY,
I got bored with being the only committer who tries to answers the user's
questions and making commits to keep the project alive.
So, I continue (for now) to answer some question on mailing lists but
stopped committing months ago.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser
Makes sense to me. It just seems like this call went out to save Lucene.Net,
and there was some initial activity, but since then it seems to have really
dropped off.
There is no way we'll make any end of year deadline with the current activity
level. I'm hoping it's just thanksgiving that is
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Try without --find-jvm-dll and setting the Path in the shell first.
Yes, I've tried it both ways -- same problem.
the Web seems to indicate that this problem comes from mixing malloc
and free calls from two different libc's.
Bill
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Bill Janssen wrote:
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Try without --find-jvm-dll and setting the Path in the shell first.
Yes, I've tried it both ways -- same problem.
the Web seems to indicate that this problem comes from mixing malloc
and free calls from two
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
So you're mixing three compiler runtimes ? (7.1, 9.0, mingw-gcc)
Yes, that's right. Although the promise of MinGW is that they build
MSVC-compatible programs which link with the standard MSVC libraries.
In fact, when you run the Windows equivalent of ldd on
adding FieldsNames by configuration for SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory
---
Key: SOLR-2258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2258
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fehling updated SOLR-2258:
Attachment: SOLR-2258.patch
patch added.
Defaults to addfieldsNames to true.
To omit fields names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965151#action_12965151
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2149:
-
Are we still working on this issue? It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965152#action_12965152
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2148:
-
Are we still working on this issue? It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965153#action_12965153
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
Are we still working on this issue? It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965155#action_12965155
]
Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
Simon,
I am willing to work on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fehling updated SOLR-2258:
Attachment: (was: SOLR-2258.patch)
adding FieldsNames by configuration for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fehling updated SOLR-2258:
Attachment: SOLR-2258.patch
adding FieldsNames by configuration for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965161#action_12965161
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
I think the overall direction of Spatial Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2779:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2779.patch
Attached patch combines the changes to RAMDir and the changes to
TopFieldCollector throws AIOOBE if numHits is 0
---
Key: LUCENE-2785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965169#action_12965169
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2778:
bq. Here's my take: personally i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965172#action_12965172
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2785:
---
+1, I needed the same. Its often a use case
I realize the benefits of not storing the backwards source -- I don't care
too much about the size of the checkout, but more about it making
introducing bw breaks easier.
And that that it happened w/ MockRAMDir only so far, doesn't mean it won't
bite us somewhere else too. But it's not a good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965175#action_12965175
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-2129:
---
Hi all, in case someone had a chance to try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965180#action_12965180
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2785:
It would be good if we could have a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:48, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
The break was only in MockRAMDir, and even
that is because I changed fileMap type from HashMap to Map, which IMO should
have been defined like that from the beginning.
As a piece of trivia.
I did some benchmarks and declaring
We can try writing tests that only check binary compatibility for
public/protected members?
And use these for back-compat testing.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:47, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
I realize the benefits of not storing the backwards source -- I don't care
too much about the size
Oh, Shai already said this, so +1.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 13:11, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
We can try writing tests that only check binary compatibility for
public/protected members?
And use these for back-compat testing.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:47, Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965188#action_12965188
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2785:
So... IndexSearcher.search (the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965192#action_12965192
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2785:
---
bq. So... IndexSearcher.search (the one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965193#action_12965193
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2778:
-
bq. I don't think we should allow limitations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965194#action_12965194
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2779:
-
bq. Cloning the keySet() will be
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should deprecate and remove Version constants as Lucene progresses?
Imagine there's a number of features in 4.x that get deprecated and
un-defaulted in 5.x, then removed in 6.x
Our user compiled with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965198#action_12965198
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2781:
This is awesome work -- thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965202#action_12965202
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2785:
-
A Collector, that counts - priceless.
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2011/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 305 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
my fault, i thought I had changed these nocommits to TODOs as
discussed on the issue
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2011/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965204#action_12965204
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2781:
-
Committed revision 1040463.
Thanks a lot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965205#action_12965205
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2779:
bq. toArray() with no parameters failed on CHM?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Like you said, the rest of the tests just increase the test running time.
I'm not completely sure about this: do we always switch over our tests
to do the equivalent checks both against the new API and the old API
when we make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2781:
Attachment: LUCENE-2781_3x.patch
attached is a patch for the branch_3x changes.
Drop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2781.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Committed revision 1040505 for the 3x changes.
Improve analyzer/version handling in Solr
-
Key: SOLR-2259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2259:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2259.patch
here is a patch for part 1. This patch is intended for trunk only.
it adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965227#action_12965227
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2259:
-
+1, thanks for the work!
Your ideas sound great,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965232#action_12965232
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2259:
---
bq. we should add a general framework for these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965234#action_12965234
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2779:
I plan to commit this tomorrow, so if you have
Hello,
someone can explain the difference between queryNorm and FieldNorm in
debugQuery??
why if i push one bf boost up, the queryNorm goes down??
i made some modifies..before the situation was different. why??
thanx
--
Gastone Penzo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965235#action_12965235
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2779:
---
I am fine, there is only a typo copied from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-2088:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
contrib/extraction fails on a turkish computer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965240#action_12965240
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2779:
--
OK, a few points on the latest patch:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965242#action_12965242
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2186:
-
bq. Is there any test cases that cover
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965245#action_12965245
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2779:
---
Yonik: You are right. In Sun Java 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2259:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2259.patch
here's the updated patch, that uses the ant property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi resolved SOLR-2252.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
trunk: Committed revision 1040608.
branch_3x:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965245#action_12965245
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2779 at 11/30/10 11:53 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965293#action_12965293
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2779:
Ok I can change the code to: new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965295#action_12965295
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
bq. I say we close these issues and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965296#action_12965296
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2779:
-
Quoting Sun JDK 1.6:
{code}
public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965297#action_12965297
]
Robert Jordan commented on LUCENENET-384:
-
The current version of Lucene.Net is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965298#action_12965298
]
Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
What I do not see today in Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965300#action_12965300
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2779:
---
Earwin: I wanted to say the same.
JRockit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965301#action_12965301
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2779:
-
Hi:
please don't post sun/oracle proprietary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965303#action_12965303
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2779:
---
The only performant variant of that code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965303#action_12965303
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2779 at 11/30/10 12:42 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965303#action_12965303
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2779 at 11/30/10 12:43 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965305#action_12965305
]
Ian Boston commented on LUCENE-2774:
I am sure you know this, but, this patch fixes an
I'm playing with dismax and the mm parameter. Actually, configuring it in
solrconfig.xml. Starting simply, I just put 2 in, then I auto-formatted the
xml now it looks like:
str
2
/str
When executing this, I get a number format exception at
o.a.solr.util.SolrPluginUtils.calculateMinShouldMatch
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Also, note how version 9 of msvcrt.dll is on the stack. Is that what
you'd expect from your mingw build ?
Yes, here's the somewhat elided link line:
C:\MinGW\bin\g++.exe -mno-cygwin -shared -s
build\temp.win32-2.7\Release\jcc\sources\jcc.o [...]
On 2010-11-30 19:07, Erick Erickson wrote:
And on the subject of code: I just rebuilt the IDEA projects. Running
SolrPluginUtilsTest tests from within the IDE gives:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Can't find
resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or 'solr/conf/',
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
This patch separates out most of the deletes storage and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965359#action_12965359
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2779:
I did hit an AIOOBE though, and I use IBM's JDK,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
Now we're returning the DocumentsWriterThreadState to IW
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965376#action_12965376
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2779:
bq. But I still don't think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965380#action_12965380
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2779:
-
bq. So I ended up writing the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2785:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2785.patch
Patch.
I moved the numHits 0 check down into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965396#action_12965396
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2779:
---
Code looks good, I would only chnage the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965406#action_12965406
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2241:
---
See
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2003/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.TestLBHttpSolrServer.testReliability
Error Message:
No live SolrServers available to handle this request
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965458#action_12965458
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
Nicolas,
Its true that Solr does not support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965459#action_12965459
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
+1 on deprecation (I thought we already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965460#action_12965460
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
bq. +1 on deprecation (I thought we already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965468#action_12965468
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Here's a random guess, I think
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:34:27AM -0500, Robert Muir wrote:
Is it somehow possible i could convince everyone that all the analyzers we
provide are simply examples? This way we could really make this a bit more
reasonable and clean up a lot of stuff.
I understand what you're getting at. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965531#action_12965531
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
So we're good with closing? I'll close all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965532#action_12965532
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2241:
---
Trunk: Committed revision 1040815.
Branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965533#action_12965533
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2088:
---
Should be resolved via SOLR-2241.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2088.
---
Resolution: Fixed
with tika 0.8, this is no longer a problem... html/pdf seems to work fine (the
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2039/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965540#action_12965540
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2139:
--
bq. As far as I understand the spatial search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965541#action_12965541
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
I'd say that thats what we want to determine some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2779:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2779.patch
Patch w/ the latest code + a typo fix. I will commit it later today.
no need for LowerCaseFilter from ArabicAnalyzer
---
Key: LUCENE-2786
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2786
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
I'm curious about somethings in the ThaiAnalyzer
It has:
@Override
public TokenStream reusableTokenStream(String fieldName, Reader reader)
throws IOException {
if (overridesTokenStreamMethod) {
// LUCENE-1678: force fallback to tokenStream() if we
// have been subclassed and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965575#action_12965575
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2786:
--
I bet it is there for mixed language texts.
no need
Only analyzers which have non-final tokenStream/reusableTokenStream methods
have this. As soon as Analyzer itself or both methods are final, this code
block is not needed.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de http://www.thetaphi.de/
eMail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965583#action_12965583
]
Ibrahim commented on LUCENE-2786:
-
O.K i think i messed this
Thanks
no need for
95 matches
Mail list logo
