[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2827) JaroWinklerDistance returns 0f when s1.length()=s2.length()=0

JaroWinklerDistance returns 0f when s1.length()=s2.length()=0 - Key: LUCENE-2827 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2827 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug

Solr-trunk - Build # 1349 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1349/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 20515 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands,

RT branch status

After merging trunk into the RT branch it's finally compiling again and up-to-date. Several tests are failing now after the merge (43 out of 1427 are failing), which is not too surprising, because so many things have changed (segment-deletes, flush control, termsHash refactoring, removal of

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973589#action_12973589 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2694: bq. mike - do you mind if I take

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973591#action_12973591 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2694: Patch looks awesome! Really,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973592#action_12973592 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2694: OK I tested perf on 10 M wiki

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973593#action_12973593 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1410: bq. In the 1410e patch here are

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2312) Search on IndexWriter's RAM Buffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973597#action_12973597 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312: bq. We could add a flag that

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2312) Search on IndexWriter's RAM Buffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973598#action_12973598 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312: bq. Simple patch that's added a

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-2694: --- Assignee: Simon Willnauer (was: Michael McCandless) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2312) Search on IndexWriter's RAM Buffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973696#action_12973696 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312: -- bq. how will we incrementally update

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2694: Attachment: LUCENE-2694.patch {quote} Can we move TermStateBase (now under

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2312) Search on IndexWriter's RAM Buffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973732#action_12973732 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312: -- bq. Maybe we add a supportsOrd() to

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973733#action_12973733 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- No need to be sorry. Thanks for taking this

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2324) Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973734#action_12973734 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324: -- As per Michael B's email, I'll start

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2824) optimizations for bufferedindexinput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973735#action_12973735 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2824: -- Do these performance comparison tests (posted

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2312) Search on IndexWriter's RAM Buffer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973739#action_12973739 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2312: -- We shouldn't put to much magic down in the

Re: running solr tests in eclipse

: importantly if i wanna run a single testcase by : -Dtestcase=org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting.testFacets clean test I think that should be -Dtestcase=TestFaceting -Dtestmethod=testFacets : I am not even sure if the test is really running .. also why cant I just run : the test directly by

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2824) optimizations for bufferedindexinput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973783#action_12973783 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2824: - {quote} Do these performance comparison tests

[jira] Created: (SOLR-2292) Lock down NamedList API, remove inefficent and esoteric methods

Lock down NamedList API, remove inefficent and esoteric methods --- Key: SOLR-2292 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2292 Project: Solr Issue Type: Task

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973790#action_12973790 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1410: - On LUCENE-2723, I uploaded a bulk vint codec

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2288) clean up compiler warnings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973791#action_12973791 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2288: bq. can we just use: NamedList? rather then bind it

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2292) Lock down NamedList API, remove inefficent and esoteric methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973796#action_12973796 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2292: --- Hossman: good idea to break out this issue. I found

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2828) SimilarityDelegator broke back-compat for subclasses overriding lengthNorm

SimilarityDelegator broke back-compat for subclasses overriding lengthNorm -- Key: LUCENE-2828 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2828 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2828) SimilarityDelegator broke back-compat for subclasses overriding lengthNorm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2828: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2828.patch Patch w/ test case showing the failure.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973827#action_12973827 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- I had a quick look at the codecs for this,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973830#action_12973830 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1410: Yes positions are bulk coded too,

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-1993) SolrJ binary update erro when commitWithin is set.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1993. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.4.2 Assignee: Hoss Man Committed revision 1051611. -

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-2289) The example documents have the same lat/lon for the store field for several stores. Space them out.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2289. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 Thanks Erick! Committed revision 1051636. The example

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

improve termquery pk lookup performance - Key: LUCENE-2829 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Search

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2829: Attachment: LUCENE-2829.patch quickly hacked up patch, for the IndexSearcher case, we sum up

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973869#action_12973869 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2829: I made a random PK lookup tester

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-2275) Spaces around mm parameter in dismax configuration cause NumberFormatException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2275. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 1051641. - trunk Spaces around mm parameter in dismax

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973877#action_12973877 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2829: - right, we just have to not do stupid things

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973882#action_12973882 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-2829: -- The patch is over my head, but providing a super

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973889#action_12973889 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2829: - Hoss Man, well I think if you surely know its a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973892#action_12973892 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2829: - bq. I think a cleaner interface may be for the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973895#action_12973895 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2694: I think instead of ReaderView we

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973897#action_12973897 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- I'm running into a nocommit for the nio byte

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2829) improve termquery pk lookup performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973908#action_12973908 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2829: - bq. But, then, passing a struct

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973914#action_12973914 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1410: - {quote} I'm running into a nocommit for the nio

Lucene-3.x - Build # 218 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/218/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 21432 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands,

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2290) the termsInfosDivisor for readers opened by indexWriter should be configurable in Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973990#action_12973990 ] Tom Burton-West commented on SOLR-2290: --- Thanks Jason, I'm still working my way

Re: running solr tests in eclipse

Hey Hoss Thanks for the suggestions. I tried -Dtestcase=TestFaceting -Dtestmethod=testFacets and -Dtestcase=org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting -Dtestmethod=testFacets and it still gave the same output where it doesnt tries to the run the test ..so no success no failure .. simply shows

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-2282) Distributed Support for Search Result Clustering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Sekiguchi resolved SOLR-2282. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi trunk: Committed revision 1051715. 3x:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2838 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2838/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 2812 - Failure

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2812/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 2813 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2813/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Re: what's the differences between Hits and TopDocs

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/973354 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:41 AM, xu cheng xcheng@gmail.com wrote: hi all: I notice that ,once apon a time, long long ago...the IndexSeacher.search returns Hits, and now the returned object is TopDocs? what's the differences? any answer and

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 2818 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2818/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2846 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2846/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Re: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2839 - Still Failing

: NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=DistributedClusteringComponentTest : -Dtestmethod=testDistribSearch : -Dtests.seed=4959909076277587079:-8952133138041211916 -Dtests.multiplier=3 : : But I couldn't reproduce it on my mac. It's failing consistently on both the trunk and 3x hudson jobs,

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 2820 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2820/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 2847 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2847/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 2821 - Still Failing

Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2821/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.DistributedClusteringComponentTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions! Stack Trace:

Test instance of Gerrit?

Hi, the topic of official GIT repos for apache projects has been raised again a few weeks ago on infrastructure-...@a.o.[1] However I can't see who is doing what in which direction over there, if anything is moving at all. [1]