I agree with you that we should not tie concurrency w/in a single search to
index segments.
That solution is just a hack.
will lucene 4 support multithreads search for a single query?
I haven't found any patch about this.
2011/1/4 Michael McCandless :
> Here's the paper:
>
> http://citeseerx.is
Great!
I would suggest a new /modules for gis. It is worthwhile to have a
/modules/gis/geonames for large-scale tests/demos/benchmarks, with ant
scripts to download datasets and run the tests.
About demos: there is a lot of GEO code out there: libraries
(http://www.openmap.org/), data (geonames,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977072#action_12977072
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-2116:
-
Hey Lance,
bq. Speaking of Tika, have yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977067#action_12977067
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-2116:
-
Great! I'll try it out on 3.x and trunk.
Speakin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977065#action_12977065
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2305:
-
The best link: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976986#action_12976986
]
Martijn van Groningen edited comment on SOLR-2116 at 1/3/11 5:23 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-2116:
Attachment: SOLR-2116.patch
I've encountered the same issue on my Solr setup. After
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Apache Hudson Server
wrote:
> Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/3350/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 6586 lines...]
>
> clover.setup:
>
> clover.info:
> [echo]
> [echo] C
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/3350/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 6586 lines...]
clover.setup:
clover.info:
[echo]
[echo] Clover not found. Code coverage reports disabled.
[echo]
clover:
com
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/3349/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZooKeeperException:
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreConta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2846:
Fix Version/s: 4.0
> omitTF is viral, but omitNorms is anti-viral.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976947#action_12976947
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2846:
+1 for omitNorms to be viral.
>
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> While we are on it, would it make sense to move omitTfAP into the
>> Index enum. It always felt odd that you can omit norms using the enum
>> but use a setter to omit TF & Pos.
>
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976928#action_12976928
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2840:
bq. Using fewer threads per-searc
Here's the paper:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.156.8091
I haven't read it yet...
In general I don't like tying concurrency w/in a single search to
index segments; I'd rather they be (relatively?) independent. EG an
optimized index would then force single thread qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976902#action_12976902
]
Johannes Goll commented on SOLR-1782:
-
Wojtek and Hoss Man - are you planning to release
omitTF is viral, but omitNorms is anti-viral.
-
Key: LUCENE-2846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert M
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> While we are on it, would it make sense to move omitTfAP into the
> Index enum. It always felt odd that you can omit norms using the enum
> but use a setter to omit TF & Pos.
I think the attempted move to type safety / enums is what added t
On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
>> Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler
>> (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited
>> and I like that it inclu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976893#action_12976893
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2843:
bq. Just curious, how would the '
Kind of a nit-pick, but I don't think this needs to be limited to just
geographical search. We actually have clients who use the spatial filtering in
non-lat/lon uses (and it was designed with such in mind, hence the support for
n-dimensional distance calculations). Perhaps we should leave it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976886#action_12976886
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2845:
+1
> move contrib/benchmark to m
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> Perhaps should say, *may* silently fail? SpanTermQuery will explicitly throw
> an exception. Does PhraseQuery still silently fail these days?
not in trunk, its loud too.
-
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> /** Expert:
> *
> * If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from
> * postings for this field.
> *
> * NOTE: While this option reduces storage space
> * required in the index, it also means any query
> * requiring positional inform
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from
* postings for this field.
*
* NOTE: While this option reduces storage space
* required in the index, it also means any query
* requiring positional information, such as {...@link
* PhraseQuery} or {...@link SpanQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976862#action_12976862
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2129:
---
bq. I have no problem committing this to contrib so
Hello Mark!
Apologies for the late reply!
> Do you mind creating a JIRA issue and attaching a patch? That is usually the
> best way to go about these discussions.
We have done so here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2287.
Unfortunately, our test cases are incomplete at the moment, bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2845:
Attachment: LUCENE-2845.patch
patch, apply after doing 'svn move lucene/contrib/benchmark modules'
move contrib/benchmark to modules/benchmark
---
Key: LUCENE-2845
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2845
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976823#action_12976823
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2844:
-
David, I'll first create an issue to propose mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976820#action_12976820
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
For evaluating the performance of geospatial search
As a follow-up to this thread, I've contributed my geospatial benchmark
performance code here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2844 "benchmark geospatial
performance based on geonames.org"
-
Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated LUCENE-2844:
-
Attachment: benchmark-geo.patch
> benchmark geospatial performance based on geonames.org
> -
benchmark geospatial performance based on geonames.org
--
Key: LUCENE-2844
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2844
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2129:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2129.patch
patch synced to trunk.
i also adjusted some minor things: doesn't rely on C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976792#action_12976792
]
Sascha Szott commented on SOLR-2027:
At least a notice should be added to the Javadoc me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976608#action_12976608
]
David Smiley edited comment on SOLR-2155 at 1/3/11 10:21 AM:
-
Hi
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
wrote:
> The problem with large "start" is probably worse when sharding is involved.
> Anyone know how the shard component goes about fetching start=100&rows=10
> from say 10 shards? Does it have to merge sorted lists of 1mill+10 docsi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976752#action_12976752
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1812:
---
Doron, feel free to work on this -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976729#action_12976729
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2836:
-
OK, I'll work on getting it into contrib.
I t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976724#action_12976724
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2843:
-
I like this idea, it would be interesting to se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976709#action_12976709
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2843:
As a first test, I just made a po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976707#action_12976707
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2836:
This is a great speedup for the h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2843:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2843.patch
Attached patch.
Still some nocommits but I think it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976696#action_12976696
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2101:
-
I think we can simple move that to v4.
Add variable-gap terms index impl.
--
Key: LUCENE-2843
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-1747.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
I think this is outdated and spatial with rather go away than bein
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned SOLR-2026:
-
Assignee: (was: Simon Willnauer)
moving out
> Need infrastructure support in Solr for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved SOLR-2031.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
after all this doesn't seem to be really needed
> QueryComponent's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976691#action_12976691
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-1942:
---
bq. updated to trunk - if somebody has time a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned SOLR-1942:
-
Assignee: (was: Simon Willnauer)
> Ability to select codec per field
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2612.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
doesn't seem to be worth it...
> Add fetch-javacc task to com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2214.
-
Resolution: Invalid
see LUCENE-2781
> Remove deprecated StemExclusionSet setters in con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976688#action_12976688
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2214:
-
This seems to be invalid since LUCENE-2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2808.
-
Resolution: Fixed
this has never happened again since I merged with trunk after LUCENE-2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12976665#action_12976665
]
Marko Bonaci commented on SOLR-2305:
I'd like to help, but you'll have to explain me how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2657:
Attachment: LUCENE-2657.patch
All tests pass again with this patch. Solr test resource structrual
57 matches
Mail list logo
