[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2383:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2383.patch
Revising patch.
Also, adds a range facet for popularity field
> Velocity:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2384:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2384.patch
Attaching a patch which adds a Javascript enabled link next to "toggle expla
Velocity: Add a "toggle all fields" link
Key: SOLR-2384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2384
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Response Writers
Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2383:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2383.patch
Attachd patch fixes generalized display of facet.ranges
* Iterate over all a
Velocity: Generalize range facet display
Key: SOLR-2383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2383
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Response Writers
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2381:
Attachment: SOLR-ServletOutputWriter.patch
I just want to attach the patch, that removes usage of
S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999652#comment-12999652
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1489:
---
Just as a quick check, I used the data attached and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-403:
--
Attachment: layout2.zip
Layout 2 - extremely sparse, no frills design. I'm out of to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999641#comment-12999641
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-1489:
--
Ohtani-san, now Solr 3x/4.0 have patched versi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999635#comment-12999635
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2381:
---
Just for reference, i took a look at the jetty 7 bra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2381.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Committed revision 1074726, 1074742 (branch_3x)
> The inc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999602#comment-12999602
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2381:
Seems to work fine, +1 to commit!
I added an outp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2382:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2382.patch
> DIH Cache Improvements
> --
>
> Key: SOL
DIH Cache Improvements
--
Key: SOLR-2382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
Reporter: James Dyer
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5318/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:<2> but was:<3>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2> but was:<3>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999577#comment-12999577
]
Kevin Osborn commented on SOLR-1365:
I had almost forgotten about this issue. I should
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Frederik Kraus
wrote:
> might it not make sense to split up OR queries
> into individual filterQueries (much like the AND case, but internally)
Yep, it's made a lot of sense to enable this ever since we added
multi-select faceting (which naturally lead to OR queri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999576#comment-12999576
]
Nick Hall commented on SOLR-2058:
-
Thanks for creating this patch. I tried it out and would
Hi Guys,
testing performance of complex filter queries on a rather large index, I ran
into a few points I'd like to share and put up for discussion:
Let's say we have the following two filter queries:
fq=someField:(123 OR 234 OR 235)
fq=someField:(234 OR 123 OR 235)
Currently the filterCache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2381:
--
Attachment: jetty-util-6.1.26-patched-JETTY-1340.jar
jetty-6.1.26-patched-JETTY-1340.jar
> You mentioned sorting checked every document regardless if the document
> contains a value for the field.
Uses memory for every document... like int[maxDoc()] for an integer sort field.
> Is the same true for querying?
Nope - that's the beauty of an inverted index. The word you are
looking f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated SOLR-2375:
Attachment: SOLR-2375-2.patch
Improved patch & unit test. This now actually loads the lookup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999526#comment-12999526
]
Briggs Thompson commented on SOLR-2272:
---
As I write this I found https://issues.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999524#comment-12999524
]
Briggs Thompson commented on SOLR-2272:
---
I was thinking more of the case where two in
Thanks for your suggestion :)
I wanted to keep the lucene version closest to the c++ bindings i.e. Clucene
which supports 2.3.2 version of lucene at present.
I will try now with the latest version i.e. 3.0+
/tuxdna
On 26-Feb-2011 12:15 AM, "Andi Vajda" wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, tuxdna wrot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999518#comment-12999518
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2324:
-
bq. Outstanding issues are to fix the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999512#comment-12999512
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-377:
---
I would suggestion just creating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999495#comment-12999495
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1365:
---
In my opinion the issue should be much simpler to so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999486#comment-12999486
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-1365:
---
Just pinging this issue to see if anyone picks it up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999485#comment-12999485
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2272:
bq. I don't think that would really work if it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999481#comment-12999481
]
Troy Howard commented on LUCENENET-377:
---
I did another version of this for the 2.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999474#comment-12999474
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2381:
bq. include a patched version of jetty with correc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999468#comment-12999468
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-2381:
---
The resolution of this issue is of interest to me, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999467#comment-12999467
]
Briggs Thompson commented on SOLR-2272:
---
"The workaround today would be to just add
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, tuxdna wrote:
I built pylucene-2.4.1-1 on Fedora 14.
( https://tuxdna.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/pylucene-on-fedora-14/ )
When I did make test, I found test failures which I am pasting below:
This looks like a version of jcc "too new" for this old a pylucene is used.
Which
The included jetty server does not support UTF-8
Key: SOLR-2381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2381
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999379#comment-12999379
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2379:
---
I agree, if you find factories in trunk/branch_3x th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999367#comment-12999367
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2379:
---
About where to document, that was a question. Linkin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999366#comment-12999366
]
Andres Felipe Ospina commented on SOLR-2130:
Response:
attach in the solrconfi
Ya, I suppose the PhoneticFilterFactory could check
"DoubleMetaphone".equals( encoder ) and then create the specialized
Filter.
I don't feel strongly, but we could have:
EncoderFilter -- just uses 'encode()'
DoubleMetaphoneFilter - uses special double metaphone stuff
EncoderFilterFactory -- alway
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999360#comment-12999360
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2379:
---
{quote}
Few of the TokenFilterFactories are document
If you sort your old index file by filename, then iterate over the sorted file,
your problem is solved, no?
From: Lokendra Singh [mailto:lsingh@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 1:27 AM
To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Converting an existing index fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999358#comment-12999358
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2379:
---
Few of the TokenFilterFactories are documented at al
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 12:19 +0100, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> [Toke: Using a partial cache of BytesRef+TermState]
>
>> I don't know how you did implement that part but you might consider
>> using something like ByteBlockPool instead of Byte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999342#comment-12999342
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2379:
---
bq. Browsing through the analyzers, they are very sp
Explore if TermsEnum#seek(BytesRef, TermState) really needs a BytesRef
---
Key: LUCENE-2938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2938
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 12:19 +0100, Simon Willnauer wrote:
[Toke: Using a partial cache of BytesRef+TermState]
> I don't know how you did implement that part but you might consider
> using something like ByteBlockPool instead of BytesRef instances to
> safe an extra amount of memory. Just as a hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999311#comment-12999311
]
Salman Akram commented on LUCENE-2287:
--
Hi,
It seems the last patch was committed w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anil Sharma updated SOLR-1506:
--
Attachment: TIKA.txt
stwte
> Search multiple cores using MultiReader
>
Technically it would be possible for the PhoneticFilterFactory to return a
DoubleMetaphoneFilter for that specific case. Otherwise it would be better to
just remove support for DoubleMetaphone from the PhoneticFilterFactory and
refer to the specialized factory?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution a
Then it's funny that only the PhoneticFilter is mentioned on the WIKI while the
DoubleMetaphone is not?
What would be the correct way to resolve this mismatch aside from fixing the
documentation?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 24. feb. 2011, at 18
Hello Lokendra,
You could updates frequently. Anyway i think it is one time job.
My advice would be do insertion and updates in batch.
1. Parse your file and read 1000 lines
2. Do some aggregation and insert / update with lucene.
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999268#comment-12999268
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2379:
---
Agree. That has the benefit of improving JavaDoc qua
On 2/25/2011 12:26 AM, Lokendra Singh wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking for some guidelines to directly convert an already
existing index to Lucene index.
The index available to me is of a set of pairs. Where
each pair is :
< word , fileName >
i.e a word as a 'value1', and the 'value2' being the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999262#comment-12999262
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1656:
-
My last comment simply means, that enabling XInc
Thanks. I just stop to be concerned with them anymore, but I guess if
we get rid of them it'll spare people some time on figuring out what
they are.
Dawid
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 a
56 matches
Mail list logo
