[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115244#comment-13115244
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
Your use-case is a feature I have intended to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3466:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3466.patch
Patch which does what is described above.
Everything passes. Yay!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male reassigned LUCENE-3466:
--
Assignee: Chris Male
> Rename Analyzer.reusableTokenStream() to tokenStream()
> --
Rename Analyzer.reusableTokenStream() to tokenStream()
--
Key: LUCENE-3466
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3466
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male resolved LUCENE-3455.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Committed revision 1176191.
> All Ana
Hi, guys,
Do you have any plans to support function queries on score field? for
example, sort=floor(product(score, 100)+0.5) desc?
So far I am getting the following error:
undefined field score
I can't use subquery in this case because I am trying to use secondary
sorting, however I will be open
Could someone please give me a pointer from where can I download the latest
patch .
Thanks & Regards,
Anand
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: 26 September 2011 22:47
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-2205
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2796:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2796.patch
test only patch demonstrating problem -- passes on 3x, fails on trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115053#comment-13115053
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2796:
Example config...
{code}
...
...
uuid
{code}
Resultin
AddUpdateCommand.getIndexedId doesn't work with schema configured defaults -
UUIDField can not be used as uniqueKey field
-
Key: SOLR-2796
URL:
A test failure occurred running the tests.
revert! revert! revert!
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1317079801.log
Thanks,
Charlie Cron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/526/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.LargeVolumeBinaryJettyTest.testMultiThreaded
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.Runt
A test failure occurred running the tests.
revert! revert! revert!
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1317077281.log
Thanks,
Charlie Cron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115030#comment-13115030
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
bq. the method implies that the reopen wil
This wasn't your fault! Quite the opposite: you uncovered a
pre-existing bug :) LUCENE-3465
I'm glad you added searchAfter to 3.5!!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> my fault, I'm looking into this.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 a
I just committed fix... SearcherManager was missing some sync'd.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'll dig.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2757.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Bill: thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3464:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3464.patch
Patch, changing to .reopenIfChanged.
Still wondering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3465.
Resolution: Fixed
> IndexSearcher fails to pass docBase to Collector when usin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114957#comment-13114957
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3465:
---
Nice catch, thanks to Robert!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3465:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3465.patch
Patch, storing docBase in IndexSearcher w/ private cto
IndexSearcher fails to pass docBase to Collector when using ExecutorService
---
Key: LUCENE-3465
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3465
Project: Lucene - Java
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10683/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchAfter.testQueries
Error Message:
expected:<1186> but was:<1050>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1186> but was:<1050>
at
org.apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2795.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.5
Assignee: Jan Høydahl
As noted i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2739.
Resolution: Fixed
I've committed additional "assume" statements to the test so that we not only
verify setR
Hi Jan,
Thanks, you're probably right this question sits better in dev.
I didn't know of Poly Fieldtypes, sounds interesting.
Ideally I want to have a multivalued Poly FieldType: "openinghours", which
contains tuples of representing
but from a pretty recent comment from Grant Ingersoll in
http:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10682/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchAfter.testQueries
Error Message:
expected:<1489> but was:<1257>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1489> but was:<1257>
at
org
Hi Geert-Jan
I think this discussion is better suited in dev-list than in an issue regarding
Geo-spatial, so I'm continuing the discussion in this new thread.
Geospatial LatLonType is implemented as a PolyField
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Poly_Field_Types
Another example is MoneyField
I'll dig.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> [junit]
> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
> [junit] Testcase:
> testSearcherManager(org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager):
> C
[junit]
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
[junit] Testcase:
testSearcherManager(org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager):
Caused an ERROR
[junit] java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
[junit] java.lang.Runt
A test failure occurred running the tests.
revert! revert! revert!
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1317061081.log
Thanks,
Charlie Cron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
my fault, I'm looking into this.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/523/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchAfter.testQueries
>
> Error Message:
> expected:<207> but w
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/523/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchAfter.testQueries
Error Message:
expected:<207> but was:<226>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<207> but was:<226>
at
org.apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114839#comment-13114839
]
geert-jan brits commented on SOLR-2155:
---
David,
I try not to swamp this discussion,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114838#comment-13114838
]
Aaron McCurry commented on LUCENE-2205:
---
I have done the PagedBytes back port alrea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114804#comment-13114804
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2205:
Aaron, if it would help, I can b
Is it possible you are using an old patch on the issue?
The newer patch worked very recently for me on 3.x.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:53 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 3.4.0 and I want to use this patch. There is a compilation
> error in '
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2792:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2792.patch
First attempt on patch. It works, and I added an -i option to the command-li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114795#comment-13114795
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3464:
Another trappiness I've seen on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2215.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.5
Assignee: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114760#comment-13114760
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3464:
bq. Can we just make it final wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3461.
Resolution: Fixed
> Adding same IndexDocValuesField twice trips assert
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114748#comment-13114748
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3464:
I like reopenIfChanged too!
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright updated SOLR-1895:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1895-queries.patch
Attached patch including both a SearchComponent and a QParserPlugin,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114735#comment-13114735
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2795:
Full test output:
{noformat}
[junit] Testsuite: o
TestCSVLoader.commitWithin failing intermittently
-
Key: SOLR-2795
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2795
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: update
Affects Ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114726#comment-13114726
]
geert-jan brits edited comment on SOLR-2155 at 9/26/11 3:45 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2722:
--
Summary: In solr.xml, default hostPort to ${jetty.port} (was: If hostPort
is not specified, we should j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114726#comment-13114726
]
geert-jan brits commented on SOLR-2155:
---
Great thanks, I believe you interpretation o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114703#comment-13114703
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
bq. You mention: "Sorting by (multi-value) indexed
The crux of the problem is that updating a field in lucene requires we
reindex the *entire* document, not just the single field.
The approach in SOLR-139 assumes you have stored all fields, and loads
them then reindexes. After working with this for a while, it is clear
that this kind of approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114686#comment-13114686
]
geert-jan brits edited comment on SOLR-2155 at 9/26/11 2:16 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114686#comment-13114686
]
geert-jan brits commented on SOLR-2155:
---
David, to clarify:
My use-case could be eith
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114684#comment-13114684
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2715:
---
I did put a pause, but it got refactored out - looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-2792:
-
Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Allow case insensitive Hunspell stemming
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114671#comment-13114671
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
geert-jan, your impression of the capabilities of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114667#comment-13114667
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
We can even do the change in 3.x, if we ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114662#comment-13114662
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
maybe:
reopenIfChanged()
reopenOnChange
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114656#comment-13114656
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
I liked reopen()... (but also like returning n
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/253/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 11798 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright updated SOLR-1895:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1895-queries.patch
Uploaded queries-based version that uses the trick that Jan pointed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114617#comment-13114617
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3454:
-
To me merge(num) doing nothing "because there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114585#comment-13114585
]
geert-jan brits commented on SOLR-2155:
---
I have the impression that this code is mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3305:
Attachment: ip-clearance-Kuromoji.xml
here is an updated ip-clearance file. Since this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114568#comment-13114568
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-3454:
-
I've seen people optimize after every single a
Hi all,
I found this paper interesting, it discusses several optimization
methods for in-memory inverted indexes. E.g. random access compressed
postings lists, a self-index (i.e. inverted index with positions from
which you can reconstruct the original text, could be perhaps useful for
storin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114551#comment-13114551
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-1895:
---
bq. There are good reasons to stick with the wildcar
Hi,
I’d like to do bulk updating on a single field, i.e. provide a field name once
and then a long list of document ids and values to update only that field and
leaving the others intact. I noticed SOLR139 / 828.
If I’m reading this correctly it looks as though it was abandoned three years
ago;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114521#comment-13114521
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
+1 reopenOnChange()
Names
Hi,
I am using solr 3.4.0 and I want to use this patch. There is a compilation
error in 'TermInfosReader' class in the patch as it is not able to find
following classes:
import org.apache.lucene.util.cache.Cache;
import org.apache.lucene.util.cache.SimpleLRUCache;
On google search I found tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-2791.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Replication: abortfetch is broken if replication was started b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-2791:
Component/s: (was: Build)
replication (java)
Aff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114504#comment-13114504
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2791:
-
Committed revision 1175696 on tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114499#comment-13114499
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
A lot of these timing tests, on retrospect, seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114492#comment-13114492
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
just a couple of variants:
tryReopen(
75 matches
Mail list logo