Hi Thomas,
I'm working towards getting a PyLucene 4.1 release ready.
All unit tests were ported to the new API and now I'm onto samples.
The Lucene in Action samples are going to be dropped from the release as
they're not currently supported or being rewritten by the original (or
future)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4759:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4759.patch
Trivial patch. Removes SortBy and as a result few Heap impls as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575381#comment-13575381
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4765:
-
We can consider the IntsRef (i generally try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575386#comment-13575386
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4765:
Oh, you're right, I notice now that it adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575388#comment-13575388
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4765:
-
Thats not the intention of this issue at all.
Nice one ;)
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
It's like in Mario when you find the hidden way to all the warp tubes.
ShouldNotReachHere() has been breached.
- Mark
[junit4:junit4] JVM J4: stdout (verbatim)
[junit4:junit4] #
[junit4:junit4] #
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/4239/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_38 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 16952 lines...]
rat-sources:
[echo]
[echo] *
[echo] Summary
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/4216/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_10 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 17564 lines...]
rat-sources:
[echo]
[echo] *
[echo] Summary
[echo]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575400#comment-13575400
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4759:
[branch_4x commit] Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575401#comment-13575401
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4759:
[trunk commit] Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4759.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.2
Lucene Fields: New,Patch
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/207/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.6.0 -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 16903 lines...]
rat-sources:
[echo]
[echo] *
[echo] Summary
[echo] ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4762:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4762.patch
Patch replaces all examples by simpler versions. There are no
Clinton Gormley created LUCENE-4766:
---
Summary: Pattern token filter which emits a token for every
capturing group
Key: LUCENE-4766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4766
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Gormley updated LUCENE-4766:
Attachment: LUCENE-4766.patch
Patch implementing
Shai Erera created LUCENE-4767:
--
Summary: Add FacetRequest.ResultMode.AUTO_EXPAND
Key: LUCENE-4767
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4767
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Clinton Gormley updated LUCENE-4766:
Description:
The PatternTokenizer either functions by splitting on matches, or allows you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manpreet updated LUCENE-3550:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-8550.patch
patch for 8550 [includes only SimpleExample testcase]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575430#comment-13575430
]
Manpreet commented on LUCENE-3550:
--
Hi Shai - I have created the first patch which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manpreet updated LUCENE-3550:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-8550.patch)
Create example code for core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manpreet updated LUCENE-3550:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3550.patch
Renamed to 3550.
Create example code for core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4762.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.2
Assignee: Shai Erera
I don't know what happened, but the error stopped ... I will report back if
I see it again.
Shai
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
When I run 'ant documentation-lint' on 4x, I get this error:
Tidy was unable to process file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575436#comment-13575436
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4764:
I think that 30% more RAM is ok .. i.e. either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575438#comment-13575438
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4764:
-
{quote}
I think that 30% more RAM is ok ..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575439#comment-13575439
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4764:
-
And again by option: means users pick their
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575440#comment-13575440
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4764:
I don't think if we chose the Codec it's sneaky.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575441#comment-13575441
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4764:
The 30% RAM overhead I measured
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-4425:
---
Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Provide a way to change state of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anshum Gupta updated SOLR-3755:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3755-CoreAdmin.patch
Change for CoreAdmin split to not create cores. It accepts core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anshum Gupta updated SOLR-4415:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4415.patch
Without Unit tests for now but would add those soon.
Vadim Kirilchuk created LUCENE-4768:
---
Summary: Child Traversable To Parent Block Join Query
Key: LUCENE-4768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4768
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vadim Kirilchuk updated LUCENE-4768:
Attachment: LUCENE-4768-draft.patch
Child Traversable To Parent Block Join Query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vadim Kirilchuk updated LUCENE-4768:
Description:
Hi everyone
Let me describe what i am trying to do:
I have hierarchical
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vadim Kirilchuk updated LUCENE-4768:
Description:
Hi everyone!
Let me describe what i am trying to do:
I have hierarchical
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575560#comment-13575560
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3705:
---
A few comments.
Can you add a test-case proving
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/242/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.SyncSliceTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Test Setup Failure: shard1 should have just been set up to be inconsistent -
but it's still consistent.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575570#comment-13575570
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4764:
bq. I think that it would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4748:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4748.patch
New patch, switching back to static methods that now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575579#comment-13575579
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2599:
--
Anyone can edit the Wiki by creating a logon,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicola Buso updated LUCENE-4748:
Attachment: DrillSideways-alternative.tar.gz
This is another implementation of the brilliant idea
Jack Krupansky created SOLR-4426:
Summary: NRTCachingDirectoryFactory does not initialize
maxCachedMB and maxMergeSizeMB if directoryFactory is not present in
solrconfig.xml
Key: SOLR-4426
URL:
Jack Krupansky created SOLR-4427:
Summary: Solr should complain with a readable warning if more than
one of a plugin type occurs in solrconfig.xml and only one is used
Key: SOLR-4427
URL:
Otis,
It reminds me https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1535 How do they
match?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When a doc is pushed into SolrCloud it is sent to all shard's replicas for
analysis and indexing, right?
Yeah, something like that :)
Is that used in SolrCloud when sending docs to replicas to avoid all
replicas having to do the exact same analysis?
Otis
--
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 11, 2013 1:51 AM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
wrote:
Otis,
It reminds me
Nope, as far as I know.
Even that field type work itself, I suppose it's not a piece of cake to
marry it with SolrCloud.
How much an additional software complexity and development efforts you'd
spend for that CPU gain? Is it really sensible for you? How big your
replication factor (or quantor) ?
I don't have a problem looking to fix with that. It just occurred to me
that avoiding double/triple work might be nice.
Otis
--
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 11, 2013 2:12 AM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
wrote:
Nope, as far as I know.
Even that field type work itself, I suppose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vadim Kirilchuk updated LUCENE-4768:
Description:
Hi everyone!
Let me describe what i am trying to do:
I have hierarchical
48 matches
Mail list logo
