[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13643915#comment-13643915
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-4772:
-
Thx Hoss, I'll upload another patch.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-trunk/77/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 33054 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-trunk/lucene/build/fakeRelease
[copy] Copying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Upayavira updated SOLR-4772:
Attachment: DateRoundingUpdateProcessorFactory.zip
Updated patch that answers these points - particularly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13643943#comment-13643943
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-4772:
-
Thinking about it, I should convert this to a generic
I just noticed that Solr no longer supports implicit collection name, at least
for /update and /select. Is this an intentional feature deprecation, or just an
outright bug? I hope it’s the latter, but with some of the drawn-out
discussions related to core discovery and solr.xml in recent weeks,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
I just noticed that Solr no longer supports implicit collection name, at
least for /update and /select. Is this an intentional feature deprecation,
or just an outright bug? I hope it’s the latter, but with some of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4965:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4965.patch
New patch incorporating Shai's feedback ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4965:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4965.patch
Woops, trying again ...
Add dynamic
Erick Erickson created SOLR-4773:
Summary: New discovery mode needs to insure that instanceDir is a
relative path
Key: SOLR-4773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson reassigned SOLR-4773:
Assignee: Erick Erickson
New discovery mode needs to insure that instanceDir is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644031#comment-13644031
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-4773:
-
Yeah the nightly smoker already failed! I hope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644032#comment-13644032
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4965:
Thanks Mike. Looks good! Few more comments:
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4965:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4965.patch
Patch, just moving things under oal.facet.range.
I'm
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5334/
Java: 32bit/ibm-j9-jdk6
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoinSorting.testNestedSorting
Error Message:
limit=2 actual=4
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: limit=2 actual=4
at
This one reproduces with Oracle JDK 6 or 7, 32 or 64 bit. It is not an J9
issue, it's a real bug!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Policeman Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@thetaphi.de]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644041#comment-13644041
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4773:
--
4.3 RC3 example runs fine for me.
branch_4x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4773:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4773.patch
Here's a preliminary patch that I really don't like much, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644043#comment-13644043
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4773:
--
[~thetaphi] Don't think this affects 4.3, or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644046#comment-13644046
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4773:
--
I take it back, the new test in the patch does
I think Martijn is looking into it?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
This one reproduces with Oracle JDK 6 or 7, 32 or 64 bit. It is not an J9
issue, it's a real bug!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644065#comment-13644065
]
Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-4956:
bq. As for where the analyzer code itself lives,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4965:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4965.patch
New patch, breaking out separate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644076#comment-13644076
]
Jack Krupansky commented on LUCENE-4956:
Looking at the actual tar file, I notice
Yonik:
See SOLR-4773.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
wrote:
I just noticed that Solr no longer supports implicit collection name, at
least for /update and /select. Is this
I looked into a previous failure of this test and committed a fix for that.
I think that fix caused this failure. In the fix I use of the NoMergePolicy
and this seems to break the assert in the
RandomIndexWriter#doRandomForceMerge() method.
On 28 April 2013 19:17, Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644101#comment-13644101
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4965:
Comments:
* Range is not really extendable
Ah,
we have other tests that also set nomerge policy. So RandomIndexWriter checks
what happens if you call forceMerge? This should be a noop for this merge
policy?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4773:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4773.patch
Different approach, putting up for comment before committing. Are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4773:
-
Summary: New discovery mode needs to insure that instanceDir is correct
(was: New discovery mode
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-4966:
--
Summary: Add CachingWrapperFilter.sizeInBytes()
Key: LUCENE-4966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4966
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4966:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4966.patch
Patch.
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644156#comment-13644156
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4965:
bq. Range is not really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4965:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4965.patch
Patch w/ last round of fixes...
Add
Ahh sneaky ... this has tripped us up before. I just committed a fix
to RIW to not doRandomForceMerge when NoMergePolicy is in use.
Thanks Martijn!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Ah,
we have other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644162#comment-13644162
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on LUCENE-4956:
I think this would be a valuable
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-4967:
--
Summary: Absorb NRTManager entirely into a separate reopen thread
class
Key: LUCENE-4967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4967
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4967:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4967.patch
Patch, I think it's ready.
Absorb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644170#comment-13644170
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4759:
--
[branch_4x commit] ehatcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644171#comment-13644171
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4759:
--
[trunk commit] ehatcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher resolved SOLR-4759.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.4
5.0
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5340/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_21 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 30512 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/build.xml:384: The following
error occurred while
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-java7/3940/
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 33618 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-java7/build.xml:378:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/5398/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_21 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 33412 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:378: The following
error
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5343/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.6.0_45 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 29798 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/build.xml:384: The following
error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644279#comment-13644279
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4965:
bq. Ie overlapping ranges should be allowed?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell reassigned SOLR-4685:
---
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
JSON response write modification to support RAW JSON
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644282#comment-13644282
]
SooMyung Lee commented on LUCENE-4956:
--
Hi Steve and Christian, What should I do in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13644287#comment-13644287
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2242:
-
Yeah. This issue has stalled. To get it ready for
48 matches
Mail list logo
