8.6.1 Release

2020-07-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Hi, There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant an immediate bug fix release. I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other commitments, however Andrzej menti

Re: Regression in 8.6

2020-07-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Thanks a lot for confirming! I'll propose a 8.6.1 release based on this. On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 10:48 am Atri Sharma, wrote: > Tried this out. I see the performance regressions on similar lines > (tried with a smaller JVM). > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 2:07 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > >

Re: Regression in 8.6

2020-07-21 Thread Atri Sharma
Tried this out. I see the performance regressions on similar lines (tried with a smaller JVM). On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 2:07 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > > Would it be possible for you to run the repro steps mentioned in the jira to > confirm? > > On Tue, 21 Jul, 2020, 1:15 am Atri Sharma, w

Re: Regression in 8.6

2020-07-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Hi Mike, I'm specifically talking about SOLR-12845, which caused a regression in 8.6. Please ignore the link in the first mail in this thread, I corrected it to point to SOLR-12845. Thanks, Ishan On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:11 PM Mike Drob wrote: > When was autoscaling added? I’m trying to find a

Re: Regression in 8.6

2020-07-21 Thread Mike Drob
When was autoscaling added? I’m trying to find a source of truth jira but having issues with it. Is this big enough to go to 8.7 instead of 8.6.1? On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:37 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would it be possible for you to run the repro steps mention

Re: Parallel SQL join on multivalued fields

2020-07-21 Thread Piero Scrima
any suggestion on this? Thanks Il giorno mer 1 lug 2020 alle ore 11:22 Piero Scrima ha scritto: > Hi, > > I don't know if this is the right place for my question, anyway I'll try > to explain the issue here and understand together with you if it's worth > working on it. > I'm working with the pa