I'm curious if "gradlew idea" is needed. Is seem to remember idea just
importing a gradlew project with no additional steps? Although it's
possible I had run the setup commander and forgotten.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020, 3:39 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
> The "How to contribute" page here:
>
>
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:03:35.993520]
Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 12:05 PM Namgyu Kim wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:22:31.165879]
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:53 AM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.3
>>
>>
>> The
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:22:31.165879]
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:53 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.3
>
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
>
@Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
The naming is up for debate and it doesn't matter at this point in
time. I believe it has to be an official release to have enough
credibility. People trust the Apache brand and the community. This
will ensure that we get enough people to test this out. The very
objective
Hi,
In addition the gradle build scripts in the reference_impl branch seems very
outdated and does not support Policeman-Jenkins Multi-JVM testing. Although it
will print that it ran with later Java version, in fact it runs with JDK 11
only, as RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME is ignored.
Uwe
Hi,
I enabled the „gradlew check” runs on ASF Jenkins and Policeman Jenkins (Linux,
Windows, MacOS).
I used branch (“reference_impl”). Is this correct, because it’s about a month
old?
There’s also a much newer “reference_impl_dev” branch. Which one is correct?
I will go sleeping now,
I'm glad to see efforts to merge the reference branch changes into master.
I do agree with the previous comments that calling it "Solr 10" (even with
the "-alpha") would confuse users, maybe use "reference"? or maybe
something in reference to SOLR-14788? Don't know what's the issue with the
The "How to contribute" page here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/HowToContribute
contains links to two obsolete pages for configuring Eclipse and IntelliJ:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/HowToConfigureEclipse
> I do hope we manage to port to master all these improvements!
Ilan: It is a very important consideration. We should ensure that this
happens (either these changes are ported to master in chunks, or this
branch becomes master after fixing the history to decompose in meaningful
chunks).
>
(The comments below are in the context of +1 of getting this working out.)
When we say "let users try", do we mean actual public with a release
published on our website?
Because I can see the publishing of version 10, however it is tagged
(alpha, whatever), completely confusing people about the
Hi Ishan,
Let's say Solr 10 ( or whatever name gets picked ) turns out stable enough
in the alpha phase - What would the next step be?
Would we bring back all the changes to master? Do you have a sense into how
that would end up playing out? Could it be brought in chunks or would it
have to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
