Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

2021-09-24 Thread Walter Underwood
I have a search story from Netflix about how much the first words matter. We had two movies named “The Other Boleyn Girl”. One was an older BBC miniseries and the other was a recent Hollywood film. The BBC result was #1, which seemed wrong, but it was in more rental queues, so people really

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

2021-09-24 Thread David Smiley
Agreed Walter. At least it's better than before. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:09 AM Walter Underwood wrote: > it seems odd too start with a statement that there is a mailing list > without any idea why

Re: Accessibility of SegmentInfo::setDiagnostics

2021-09-24 Thread Adrien Grand
I'd +1 a change that makes setDiagnostics public. Longer term I wonder if we should have a more locked down API that _only_ allows setting diagnostics. There are lots of things in SegmentCommitInfo that merges should never override like the segment ID, and I can't think of anything else than

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

2021-09-24 Thread Walter Underwood
it seems odd too start with a statement that there is a mailing list without any idea why the person cares. That is why my suggestions started with the person’s need, not with the bare fact of the mailing list. People are likely to skip over that whole paragraph after they scan “This project

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10062) Explore using SORTED_NUMERIC doc values to encode taxonomy ordinals for faceting

2021-09-24 Thread Michael Sokolov
Hard to read on the phone, but is that a 482% speed up I saw??! On Thu, Sep 23, 2021, 1:28 PM Greg Miller (Jira) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17419349#comment-17419349 > ] > > Greg

Accessibility of SegmentInfo::setDiagnostics

2021-09-24 Thread Chris Hegarty
In an effort to prepare Elasticsearch for modularization, we are investigating and eliminating split packages. The situation has improved through recent refactoring in Lucene 9.0 [1], but a number of split packages still remain. This message identifies one such so that it can be discussed in

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.0 RC1

2021-09-24 Thread Namgyu Kim
+1 SUCCESS! [1:01:04.224368] On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:42 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

2021-09-24 Thread Adrien Grand
Infra helped me change the message yesterday, thanks for the discussion on this thread. +1 on your PR to the project's README. The problem I saw with Jira recently - and I acknowledge that there might be a bias - is that users had read our