Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Artifacts-main - Build # 391 - Still Failing!

I corrected Jenkins job definition to run "assembleRelease" and to collect artifacts from the right location (lucene/distribution/build/release/**). On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:36 AM Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Artifacts-main/391/ > >

Re: should we clean up dev-docs?

> We also have the help/ folder which is plaintext since it can be invoked with > ./gradlew helpXXX. Someone should decide what goes in help/ vs dev-docs/ In all honesty, I prefer plain text files, much in the spirit of RFC documents. They work well, they display well on all known terminals and

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:11:35.593338] On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:41 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Smoke tester passed w/ JDK 8. > > SUCCESS! [1:18:04.585401] > > Also tried a basic app w/ indexing and search and everything I tested > worked as expected. > > Thanks for doing this, Mayya! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 (binding) Smoke tester passed w/ JDK 8. SUCCESS! [1:18:04.585401] Also tried a basic app w/ indexing and search and everything I tested worked as expected. Thanks for doing this, Mayya! On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:00 PM Mayya Sharipova wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for

Re: should we clean up dev-docs?

A cleanup is needed. One dev-docs folder is enough now :) We also have the help/ folder which is plaintext since it can be invoked with ./gradlew helpXXX. Someone should decide what goes in help/ vs dev-docs/ Asciidoc is more capable than MD, and renders well in GitHub as well:

Re: Lucene 9.0 release

Sounds like a good plan Adrien, thanks for nailing down some concrete milestones and dates :-) Cheers, Tim On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:04 AM David Smiley wrote: > > +1 Adrien. Thanks for moving things along. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:28:35.594227] On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 9:48 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:11:55.023477] > > I blame some random antivirus or something kicking in at the same time > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:44 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > > > having a little trouble here with

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:11:55.023477] I blame some random antivirus or something kicking in at the same time On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:44 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > having a little trouble here with new laptop - after installing jdk8, > ant, and finally running the smoke tester - my laptop shut down

Re: should we clean up dev-docs?

I suspect that the adoc format got used because it was the format that was already being used for the Solr ref guide. +1 to move to Markdown. On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:49 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > I was poking around looking for info on how we release Lucene, and I > stumbled into this

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

having a little trouble here with new laptop - after installing jdk8, ant, and finally running the smoke tester - my laptop shut down due to overheating! A little afraid to try it again, but I'll try improving the air circulation ... On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:53 PM Namgyu Kim wrote: > > +1

should we clean up dev-docs?

I was poking around looking for info on how we release Lucene, and I stumbled into this dev-docs folder. It seems to have info that's mostly useful for solr workflows, assumes you are working in lucene-solr repo, etc. The info about pmc-chair seems helpful, and maybe Putnam's guide to using git

Re: Lucene 9.0 release

+1 Adrien. Thanks for moving things along. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > For visibility, I recently opened a new issue about a case of index > corruption

Re: Accessibility of CollectedSearchGroup's state

Hi Adrien, Jim, First, thank you for your time and insightful comments. They are very much appreciated, and will no doubt lead to the best solution. I will reimplement the elasticsearch collector as suggested, and then circle back here with a proposal for the reduction in accessibility most

Re: Lucene 9.0 release

For visibility, I recently opened a new issue about a case of index corruption which is a blocker for 9.0. Nhat is looking into it. We've been discussing releasing 9.0 for a long time now and I think that everybody agrees with moving forward,