Re: [GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread Tomoko Uchida
The notifications are now sent to issues@ list. Still, it could be noisy to have them in there for many of you, we could not set a fake mail address to completely silence the notification. You might want to set a mail filter to screen out the notifications from the migration repository. Thanks.

Re: [GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread Tomoko Uchida
I set https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/blob/main/.asf.yaml to send all notifications to my ASF address, but this did not help... 2022年6月29日(水) 19:24 Tomoko Uchida : > Sorry, it seems the all updates in > https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive are noticed in dev@ list. > I

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta commented on issue #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread GitBox
mocobeta commented on issue #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1169860211 Thanks for reporting. I found Jira's number list (`#`) is not correctly converted and it is interpreted as headers in Markdown. Jira dump ``` "body":

Re: [GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread Tomoko Uchida
Sorry, it seems the all updates in https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive are noticed in dev@ list. I don't see the configuration/setting for the repository. Could anyone mute this? Tomoko 2022年6月29日(水) 19:06 GitBox : > > mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: > URL:

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #3: Create mapping on Jira user id -> GitHub account

2022-06-29 Thread GitBox
mocobeta opened a new issue, #3: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/3 To correctly map Jira user ids in issues (reporter/assignee/author) to GitHub account, we need an account mapping file. This could be inferred from https://github.com/orgs/apache/people? --

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #2: Archive all Jira attachments

2022-06-29 Thread GitBox
mocobeta opened a new issue, #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/2 All attachments should be archived in `attachments/`. They will be referred from the migrated issues in https://github.com/apache/lucene. For files with the same names, we keep the latest

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] dweiss commented on issue #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread GitBox
dweiss commented on issue #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1#issuecomment-1169793482 ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/199470/176411524-9d1a8998-09cb-4544-9890-282ba1ff8b31.png) This is what the bold block-issue looks like. -- This is

[GitHub] [lucene-jira-archive] mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: Fix markup conversion error

2022-06-29 Thread GitBox
mocobeta opened a new issue, #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-jira-archive/issues/1 There are various errors in converting Jira markup to Markdown. For example: - tables are broken - bullet lists converted to bold blocks (?) - bullet lists include unnecessary spaces

Re: A prototype migration tool Jira to GitHub

2022-06-29 Thread Dawid Weiss
I looked at the first random issue and noticed these (perhaps known) issues - https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/10838 1) lists are converted into bold blocks (without the list): https://github.com/mocobeta/sandbox-lucene-10557/issues/10838#issuecomment-1166777318 2) inline

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

2022-06-29 Thread Shai Erera
I think it's a matter of tradeoff. For example when you do faceting then we require complete evaluation, and since this field-matching is a kind of aggregation I think it's OK if that's how it works. Users can choose which technique they want to apply based on their usecase. Anyway I don't think