[jira] [Comment Edited] (PYLUCENE-66) JCC doesn't build with Python 3.11.

2022-11-04 Thread Andi Vajda (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17629184#comment-17629184 ] Andi Vajda edited comment on PYLUCENE-66 at 11/4/22 7:52 PM: - See code for

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PYLUCENE-66) JCC doesn't build with Python 3.11.

2022-11-04 Thread Andi Vajda (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17629184#comment-17629184 ] Andi Vajda edited comment on PYLUCENE-66 at 11/4/22 7:50 PM: - The

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-66) JCC doesn't build with Python 3.11.

2022-11-04 Thread Andi Vajda (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17629184#comment-17629184 ] Andi Vajda commented on PYLUCENE-66: The installType function in jcc/jcc3/sources/functions.cpp is

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-66) JCC doesn't build with Python 3.11.

2022-11-04 Thread Andi Vajda (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17629183#comment-17629183 ] Andi Vajda commented on PYLUCENE-66: Use the JCC in the 9.4.1 release candidate or get the diff for

Re: Dense union of doc IDs

2022-11-04 Thread Greg Miller
+1 to exploring this idea. A couple additional thoughts... I can imagine real world use cases that would benefit from this beyond the super pathological N-1 case. With dense terms, I can believe that the disjunction would start to accumulate "blocks" of documents that all match as the bitset gets

Re: Dense union of doc IDs

2022-11-04 Thread Michael Sokolov
It sounds like a lot of complexity to handle an unusual edge case, but ... I guess this actually happened? Can you give any sense of the end-user behavior that caused it? On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 2:26 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > > Hi Froh, > > The idea sounds reasonable to me, altho I wonder whether

[jira] [Commented] (PYLUCENE-66) JCC doesn't build with Python 3.11.

2022-11-04 Thread Luc Bastiaenssen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17628825#comment-17628825 ] Luc Bastiaenssen commented on PYLUCENE-66: -- Hi Andi, Is there a patch available ?  (We are

Re: Dense union of doc IDs

2022-11-04 Thread Patrick Zhai
Hi Froh, The idea sounds reasonable to me, altho I wonder whether using CONSTANT_SCORE_BOOLEAN_REWRITE would help with your case since that dense union case should be already handled by disjunction query I suppose? But that boolean rewrite is subject to max clause limit so it may have some other