Maybe there is another place to make that information available? The release page?
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 6:34 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > The goals / purpose of "Reproducible Builds" makes sense to me. > > However I wish the output that is the subject of reproducibility could be > the JAR *exclusive* of its MANIFEST.MF. There is some interesting metadata > in there -- not essential but a shame to throw away in the name of > reproducibility. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 4:27 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Some discussion on https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12096 lead to >> the question of whether or not reproducible builds ( >> https://reproducible-builds.org/) are something we would like to work >> towards. I'm a fan, though unlikely to have time to work on it soon. >> >> What I can do is monitor this thread and if the consensus seems to be >> there, make a ticket that a volunteer can work on in the future (or maybe >> me in the far future, likely after I have some more direct experience from >> implementing it for Uno-Jar and JesterJ). >> >> -Gus >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
