Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1019 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: This reproduces constantly for me, I even rolls back to some (random) old : commit: 9acc6539959 (in last September) and it still reproduces. FWIW: The oldest known failure of TestGroupFacetCollector.testRandom in my archive is the week of 2021-05-31 : Found another similar failure: :

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-MacOSX (64bit/hotspot/jdk-16.0.2) - Build # 2385 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
FWIW: This same exact failure (same assertion msg) happened on main recently as well. I've included some log snippets shouwing randomization details of both failures below. Historically this test (with this name) has existed unmodified since long before i started keeping records of failure

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Dawid Weiss
> > We should sometimes run the OpenJ9 to make it explicit that it doesn't > work. > It doesn't - there are occasional hiccups that repeat from time to time and cannot be reproduced with hotspot. We can create an umbrella issue for these errors and just append logs there, perhaps it'll be of some

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
If I have some time, I will update to newer version. We should sometimes run the OpenJ9 to make it explicit that it doesn't work. Maybe it helps to improve their code. Unfortunately I don't know how to best report issues like this. Uwe Am 01.06.2023 um 12:37 schrieb Dawid Weiss: There are

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Dawid Weiss
There are frequent odd errors on J9. I think we should turn it off and not recommend it to people, something is wrong with it. On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 12:00 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Does not reproduce for me, but, it looks like it's IBM's J9: Java: >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Michael McCandless
Does not reproduce for me, but, it looks like it's IBM's J9: Java: 64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -Xgcpolicy:balanced Maybe a J9 bug... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 5:54 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > Hmm, maybe it's a stdout/stderr

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Michael McCandless
Hmm, maybe it's a stdout/stderr issue -- the juicy failure details come out in stderr: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Linux/10811/testReport/junit/org.apache.lucene.index/TestIndexFileDeleter/testExcInDecRef/ Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.5) - Build # 10811 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Michael McCandless
It used to be that these build failure emails included the "Reproduce with: ...", thanks to Steve Rowe's incredible regular expression (the largest real-world regexp I have ever seen!!!). But I don't see it here anymore. Does anyone know why/when it broke? I know I can click through to the

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1019 - Unstable!

2023-06-01 Thread Patrick Zhai
This reproduces constantly for me, I even rolls back to some (random) old commit: 9acc6539959 (in last September) and it still reproduces. Found another similar failure: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-main/8835/ The error seems to be a more common one but somehow (so far)