[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532231#comment-16532231 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 7/4/18 5:15 AM: -- Hi Erick - I personally would

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532231#comment-16532231 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 7/4/18 4:35 AM: -- Hi Erick - I personally would

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532231#comment-16532231 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Hi Erick - I personally would be satisfied at this point (actually a few

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16531757#comment-16531757 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Amrit - Thanks for your analysis and data. I think this is promising

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518857#comment-16518857 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 6/21/18 3:13 AM: --- Hi [~joel.bernstein]  By,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518857#comment-16518857 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Hi [~joel.bernstein]   By, number of records exported, do you mean the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518857#comment-16518857 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 6/21/18 2:59 AM: --- Hi [~joel.bernstein]  By,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8659) Improve Solr JDBC Driver to support more SQL Clients

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518628#comment-16518628 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-8659 at 6/20/18 9:42 PM: -- [~risdenk] Tableau Desktop

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8659) Improve Solr JDBC Driver to support more SQL Clients

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518628#comment-16518628 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-8659: - Tableau Desktop 2018 has ODBC support and I was able to use OpenLink to connect

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16518620#comment-16518620 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Pinging this thread again.  Is there any progress on this ? This is a very

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16461242#comment-16461242 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Hi Team - is there feedback on this ? Can this be made a configurable setting

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16387975#comment-16387975 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:45 PM: -- I tried the patch and I see

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16387975#comment-16387975 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:44 PM: -- I tried the patch and I see

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16387975#comment-16387975 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 3/6/18 3:43 PM: -- I tried the patch and I see

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16387975#comment-16387975 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- I tried the patch and I see promising results over multiple runs: Query

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11600: - Comment: was deleted (was: Thanks Joel. Its good to know what the roadmap is here. Personally though I am a fan

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11600: - Comment: was deleted (was: Thanks a lot [~joel.bernstein] ! I will try and use this as the guide! ) > Add

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11600: - Comment: was deleted (was: ok Amrit. But I think we really should take a look at providing a strongly typed

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11600: - Comment: was deleted (was: Hi Amrit Can you provide a sample test for this patch ? I am trying to move forward

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup ca

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11598: - Comment: was deleted (was: I see. I am sure that benchmarking must have been done to come up with the number 4.

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup ca

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11598: - Comment: was deleted (was: Thanks Amrit! So the patch attached here allows 10 now ? and not 8 ? Also, if you

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11598: - Description: I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 dimensional document. I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261709#comment-16261709 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11600: -- Thanks a lot [~joel.bernstein] ! I will try and use this as the guide! >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261252#comment-16261252 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11600: -- Thanks Joel. Its good to know what the roadmap is here. Personally though I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16260412#comment-16260412 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11600: -- ok Amrit. But I think we really should take a look at providing a strongly

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16258396#comment-16258396 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11600: -- Hi Amrit Can you provide a sample test for this patch ? I am trying to move

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16258353#comment-16258353 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- Thanks Amrit! So the patch attached here allows 10 now ? and not 8 ? Also,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16237131#comment-16237131 ] Aroop edited comment on SOLR-11598 at 11/3/17 6:04 AM: --- I see. I am sure that

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16237131#comment-16237131 ] Aroop commented on SOLR-11598: -- I see. I am sure that benchmarking must have been done to come up with the

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11600) Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only

Aroop created SOLR-11600: Summary: Add Constructor to SelectStream which takes StreamEvaluators as argument. Current schema forces one to enter a stream expression string only Key: SOLR-11600 URL:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aroop updated SOLR-11598: - Description: I am a user of Streaming and I am currently trying to use rollups on an 10 dimensional document. I

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11598) Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities.

Aroop created SOLR-11598: Summary: Export Writer needs to support more than 4 Sort fields - Say 10, ideally it should not be bound at all, but 4 seems to really short sell the StreamRollup capabilities. Key: SOLR-11598