[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049937#comment-13049937
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-417:
Maybe something like this
doc.Add(new Field(name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049322#comment-13049322
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-425:
I would like to compare search speeds of FSDirectory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049377#comment-13049377
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-423:
I don't think there is an inconsistency between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049350#comment-13049350
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-417:
Maybe, this is a stupid question but, what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13049473#comment-13049473
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-425:
OK, I think it will be better to mark MMapDirectory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-425.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
MMapDirectory implementation
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-425:
---
Description:
Since this is not a direct port of MMapDirectory.java, I'll put it under
Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-425:
---
Attachment: MMapDirectory.patch
MMapDirectory implementation
: Digy
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Attachments: MMapDirectory.patch
Since this is not a direct port of MMapDirectory.java, I'll put it under
Support and implement MMapDirectory as
{code}
public class
I've never committed any code to 2.9.4g branch before testing. So, It should
pass all the tests.
DIGY
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
Does anyone have the latest 2.9.4g branch they can run the tests on - I've
done some WP7 stuff, and I'm coming up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-424:
---
Attachment: TestIsolatedStorageDirectory.cs
Test cases for IsolatedStorageDirectory.
(Doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047089#comment-13047089
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-423:
Maybe I am missing something,
but I run your code both
result set is small but number of
facets is relatively large as in your case.
What to use really depends on your needs(or a hybrid approach that uses both
like in Solr)
DIGY
PS: every contribution is always welcome.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047179#comment-13047179
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-423:
You are right, I used a different date string.
.Net
Have you tried to use Lucene.Net as is, before working on optimizing your
code? There are a lot of speed improvements in it since 1.9.
There is also a Faceted Search project in contrib.
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Simple+Faceted+Search
)
DIGY
-Original Message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-421.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Seems like reporter isn't interested any more in this issue.
DIGY
Segment files
Lucene.Net 2.9.2 should be able to read the index created with 1.9 without
any problem.
Can you try to search with luke
(http://www.getopt.org/luke/luke-0.9.9/lukeall-0.9.9.jar ) and iterate over
the results?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com
One more point, some write operations using Lucene.Net 2.9.2 (add, delete,
optimize etc.) upgrades automatically your index to 2.9.2.
But if your index is somehow corrupted(eg, due to some bug in 1.9) this may
result in data loss.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart
Sorry no idea. Maybe optimizing the index with 2.9.2 can help to detect the
problem.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robert_stew...@epam.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:40 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] index version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13044524#comment-13044524
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-422:
percyboy,
Thanks for your bug fix.
I commited the fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-422.
Resolution: Fixed
Custom tokenizers may fail when indexing due to ReusableStringReader not
implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-414:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.2)
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-422:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Custom tokenizers may fail when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042963#comment-13042963
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
According to my last tests, SFS searches cost only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-415.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
Committed to trunk 2.9.4g branch
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13043011#comment-13043011
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Thanks M.Herndon for this wiki page
https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13041604#comment-13041604
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-421:
This may happen when two processes/threads access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-416.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Fixed in 2.9.4 2.9.4g
DIGY
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13041634#comment-13041634
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-421:
Could you try 2.9.4 in
https://svn.apache.org/repos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040701#comment-13040701
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-420:
And you are using WildcardQuery like sometext* ?
DIGY
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040712#comment-13040712
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-420:
because it thinks that aa is å
In my test case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13039259#comment-13039259
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
With the increasing number of attached files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13039272#comment-13039272
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Hi Ben,
Do you think we still need IndexSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13039289#comment-13039289
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
I'll wait a few days before closing this issue
Hi Christopher,
According to my experience, this kind of eMails eighter gets no response or
too many fluctuations with no result.
What about preparing a *small* Proof of Concept code that passes all unit
tests.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
I take one step further
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch2.cs
Some comments.
Contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13038063#comment-13038063
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your comments test code.
{code
Digy, if you have a second to comment on anything user should be aware for
the SimpleFacetedSearch, I'm going to add documentation about it on the wiki
pulling from your commits and comments so far.
Too early for documentation. Many things may change.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13038228#comment-13038228
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
But BitSet+Caching is still faster than BooleanQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs
Hi Ben
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
some performance
Thanks Michael, I fixed it.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:48 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] build scripts v2.9.4g contrib projects build state
I get a number of build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: SimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: SimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: (was: SimpleFacetedSearch.cs)
Contrib/Faceted Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13037478#comment-13037478
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Hi Ben,
About performance test:
- One of the costly
?
Cheers,
Andy
DIGY
On 18 May 2011 23:20, Digy (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035795#comment-13035795
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
Of course, Ben.
DIGY
Contrib/Faceted Search
Contrib/Faceted Search
--
Key: LUCENENET-415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Reporter: Digy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-415:
---
Attachment: TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs
SimpleFacetedSearch.cs
Just a draft.
Needs your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13037061#comment-13037061
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
Here is the documentation of the code:)
{code
Not just this version, Lucene.Net 2.9.4 also can read (in theory) the index
created in 3.0.3. But I haven't tested it myself.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Bauer [mailto:a...@familie-bauer.info]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 8:37 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035795#comment-13035795
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Hi All,
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is almost ready for testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035817#comment-13035817
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-414:
Fixed in 2.9.4g
DIGY
The definition of CharArraySet
Sorry no binary. As far as I know it requires an official release
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:45 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-412) Replacing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13035092#comment-13035092
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
One more sample
{code}
From:
class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-405.
Resolution: Fixed
committed to trunk 2.9.4g branch
Port: contrib/Analysis.NGram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13032982#comment-13032982
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-414:
Hi Vincent,
I changed the CharArraySet implementation
http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/faceted-search-and-drill-down-lucenenet/
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, K a r n a v karunakerred...@gmail.comwrote:
How can we implement faceted search with lucene
at runtime not at
compile time).
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Van Den Berghe, Vincent (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13033031#comment-13033031
and performance are more important
than backwards compatibility.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework
Before 2.9.4g, I would surely say drop support for 2.0 completely. But now we
have two versions(2.9.4 2.9.4g) and one can continue to support 2.0 till its
death (2.9.4g may be used as base for future versions, but this is not true for
2.9.4)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard
I chose the name 2.9.4g, since 2.9.5 may give a feeling of lucene.java 2.9.5
exists.
2.9.4g is somewhere between 2.9.4 3.0.3(more close to 3.0.3)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:54 PM
To: lucene-net-dev
I must also say that I am not interested in the name of the version.
As you have said, It should be something that differentiates it from java
versions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:32 AM
To: lucene-net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030356#comment-13030356
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-266:
Hi Prescott,
Thank you for refactoring
2.0 framework.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
Using var is wonderful and great. We'll hopefully do doing a lot of
refactoring in the near
Hi Prescott,
Can you apply these fixes also to trunk? They don't diverge from java 2.9.4 and
can be compiled targetting .NET 2.0.
LUCENENET-361 Workaround for a Mono C# compiler issue
LUCENENET-330 Search.Regex Minimal Port
LUCENENET-371 Unit test for Search.Regex port
DIGY
-Original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-412:
---
Attachment: IEquatable for QuerySubclasses.patch
I am not sure about committing this IEquatable patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-413:
---
Attachment: MediumTrust.2.9.4.patch
constants.cs fix added into patch
Medium trust security issue
: Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g , .Net 4.0
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
On behalf of Richard Wilde:
Exceptions in Medium Trust(.NET 4.0)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-413:
---
Attachment: MediumTrust.2.9.4g.patch
MediumTrust.2.9.4.patch
Medium trust security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-172:
---
Attachment: lucene_2.9.4g_exceptions_fix
This patch fixes the unexceptional exceptions ecountered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-412:
---
Attachment: lucene_2.9.4g_exceptions_fix
Fix for LUCENENET-172
Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc
I just want to keep the 2.9.4g trunk in par.
The only divergence for now is LUCENENET-172 which will be applied to 2.9.4
eventually.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:08 PM
To: lucene-net
Sorry, for now, only 4.0.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:06 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.NET 2.9.4g -- only usable with .NET 4.0 ?
Digy,
Am I correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025204#comment-13025204
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Hi All,
I prepared a primitive test case where 6
LZOCompressor? Do we need it?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 3:07 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure
I guess by 'today' I meant 'In about 6 days'.
Anyhow, I completed
Everything seems to be OK.
+1 for removing old directory structure.
Thanks Troy
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 3:07 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure
I guess by 'today
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-399.
--
Resolution: Fixed
No more waiting tasks. I am closing this issue
Port changes from Java Lucene 2.9.3
: Improvement
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Reporter: Digy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
This will move Lucene.Net.2.9.4 closer to lucene.3.0.3 and allow some
performance gains.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-412:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-412.patch
Patch for Document.fields(all unit tests pass)
If it is OK, we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-409.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Assignee: Digy
Invalid Base exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-409:
---
Attachment: LUCENENET-409.patch
Invalid Base exception in DateField.StringToTime
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13021102#comment-13021102
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-409:
Hi Neal,
I'll commit the final patch which also fixes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-409:
---
Attachment: DateField.patch
Hi Neal,
Can you try the patch?
DIGY
Invalid Base exception
Thanks, updated.
DIGY
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
I had no difficulty building it in Visual Studio 2005.
The assembly copyright information appears to be out of date; shouldn't it
read 2011 not 2009 ?
- Neal
-Original
+1. No pending commits.
A copy of the current trunk somewhere else(tag, branches etc.) would be good
too.
DIGY.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like we have a 'lazy consensus', in that, no one has raised any
significant objections, a few minor
After this directory layout changes; what about replacing ArrayLists,
Hashtables etc, with appropriate Generics? This would bring us very close
to lucene 3.0.3 (and not hard to do with the help of VS).
DIGY
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good
We already have a release for .NET 2.0 (Lucene.Net 2.9.2). So, jumping to
4.0 shouldn't be a problem for Lucene,Net community.
DIGY
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good to me. I have done this previously in a local branch and
noticed massive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011160#comment-13011160
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-378:
IDisposable is added to the follwing classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011291#comment-13011291
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-399:
Hi All,
Although there is still one failing case
No, I don't think it is a bad design. It could be limited to some number,
but what would it be? 10,100,1000,100 or 1?
Besides that you have other alternatives to use while searching.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: steven.h...@pattersoncompanies.com
[mailto:steven.h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009436#comment-13009436
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-399:
There are two public fields in TopDocs, totalHits
101 - 200 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
