[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5711) Pass IW to MergePolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5711: Attachment: LUCENE-5711.patch here is a patch > Pass IW to MergePol

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5711) Pass IW to MergePolicy

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5711: --- Summary: Pass IW to MergePolicy Key: LUCENE-5711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5711 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5708) Remove IndexWriterConfig.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14011085#comment-14011085 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5708: - part of the problem is tha

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4556) FuzzyTermsEnum creates tons of objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4556: Assignee: Michael McCandless (was: Simon Willnauer) > FuzzyTermsEnum creates tons

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5693) don't write deleted documents on flush

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14005787#comment-14005787 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5693: - I really wonder if this issue mat

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr release 4.8.1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:19:33.540237] ES seems to be happy as well simon On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1: SUCCESS! [0:39:08.550817] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have

Re: [JENKINS] $PROJECT_NAME - Build # $BUILD_NUMBER - $BUILD_STATUS!

JDK update messed everything up sorry for the noise On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > Build: ${BUILD_URL} > > ${FAILED_TESTS} > > Build Log: > ${BUILD_LOG_MULTILINE_REGEX,regex="(?x: > \ >

Re: [JENKINS] $PROJECT_NAME - Build # $BUILD_NUMBER - $BUILD_STATUS!

ok it's updated now all builds use 1.7.u55 now sorry for the noise On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > Build: ${BUILD_URL} > > ${FAILED_TESTS} > > Build Log: > ${BUILD_LOG_MULTILINE_REGEX,regex="(?x: >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5644) ThreadAffinityDocumentsWriterThreadPool should clear the bindings on flush

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13989768#comment-13989768 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5644: - I think in general this looks goo

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5310) Merge Threads unnecessarily block on SerialMergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13982358#comment-13982358 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5310: - mike I like the patch a lot albe

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5310) Merge Threads unnecessarily block on SerialMergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13982208#comment-13982208 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5310: - hey mike, thanks for taking a loo

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.8.0 RC2

SUCCESS! [1:08:02.733378] Elasticsearch is happy as well... +1 simon On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 as well > SUCCESS! [0:48:27.193044] > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: >> Here is my +1: >> SUCCESS! [1:53:39.982427] >> >> Uwe >> >> - >>

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.8.0 RC1

+1 Smoketester says: SUCCESS! [1:26:32.631579] Elasticsearch is happy with the RC as well thanks uwe On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:44:41.170815] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Uwe

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5628) SpecialOperations.getFiniteStrings should not recurse

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13979419#comment-13979419 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5628: - I think it's worth

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5310) Merge Threads unnecessarily block on SerialMergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5310: Attachment: LUCENE-5310.patch here is an updated version of this patch. I moved the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5604) Should we switch BytesRefHash to MurmurHash3?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13970104#comment-13970104 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5604: - I'm +1 on getting this in

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.2 (take two)

+1 upgraded ES and run the smoky tester thanks robert On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:50:17.632575] > > -- > Mark Miller > about.me/markrmiller > > On April 10, 2014 at 10:52:47 AM, Robert Muir (rcm...@gmail.com) wrote: > > artifacts are here: > > http:/

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3237) FSDirectory.fsync() may not work properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965312#comment-13965312 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3237: - {quote} Ref counting may be over

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3237) FSDirectory.fsync() may not work properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965182#comment-13965182 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3237: - Hey mike, thanks for reopening

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5585) Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-5585. - Resolution: Fixed > Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirect

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5585) Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5585: Attachment: LUCENE-5585.patch good idea [~shaie] ...new patch moving it to IOUtils#fsync

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5585) Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5585: Attachment: LUCENE-5585.patch simple patch cleaning up the code a bit > Expose fsync

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5585) Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirectory

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5585: --- Summary: Expose fsync as a static method on FSDirectory Key: LUCENE-5585 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5585 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5583) Should BufferedChecksumIndexInput have its own buffer?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13964082#comment-13964082 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5583: - I personally think you shouldn&#x

Re: Prepare for Release of Lucene/Solr 4.8!

sounds good to me! I don't think this will keep us from doing futue 4.7.x releases if we have critical bugs that we want to provide to the folks stuck with 1.6... Not saying we have to though... simon On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > I agree that the changelog al

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.7.2

for the lazy folks here is a ready to run cmd: python3.2 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_7_2_r1585778/ 1585778 4.7.2 /tmp/4.7.2-smoke simon On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > +1 > > SUCCE

Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.7.2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:24:59.129655] I upgraded ES and all tests pass. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:13:24.830763] > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Robert Muir wrote: >> Artifacts are located here: >> http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_so

Re: 4.7.2

+1 to both 4.7.3 and 4.8 soon On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > I am fine! I would also like to push the first 4.8 RC builds soon! I will > check the changes list and open issues and make a proposal soon. > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5570) FSDirectory's fsync() is lenient

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960448#comment-13960448 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5570: - +1 LGTM > FSDirectory'

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4246) Fix IndexWriter.close() to not commit or wait for pending merges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960446#comment-13960446 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4246: - aaah you are right! nevermind

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5573) Deadlock during class loading/ initialization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959950#comment-13959950 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5573: - should we mark this 4

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5570) FSDirectory's fsync() is lenient

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959949#comment-13959949 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5570: - seems like we prepare for 4.7.2

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5574) NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5574: Fix Version/s: 4.7.2 > NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn&#x

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5574) NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959891#comment-13959891 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5574: - bq. So maybe we should just do

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4246) Fix IndexWriter.close() to not commit or wait for pending merges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959890#comment-13959890 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4246: - bq. Actually, this is a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4246) Fix IndexWriter.close() to not commit or wait for pending merges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959856#comment-13959856 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4246: - hey mike I like the compromise we

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5574) NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959821#comment-13959821 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5574: - I agree - I tried to make this p

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5574) NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5574: Attachment: LUCENE-5574.patch here is a patch that shows the issue and applies a fix. Yet

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5574) NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5574: --- Summary: NRT Reader close can wipe index it doesn't own Key: LUCENE-5574 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5574 Project: Lucene -

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5570) FSDirectory's fsync() is lenient

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959217#comment-13959217 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5570: - after looking on the bug that lea

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4246) Fix IndexWriter.close() to not commit or wait for pending merges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13957706#comment-13957706 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4246: - I want to revisit this for 4.8

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC2

I guess that vote passed? On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 smoke tester is happy. > > Tommaso > > > 2014-03-29 9:46 GMT+01:00 Steve Rowe : > >> Please vote for the second Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1. >> >> Download it here: >> >>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only - Build # 81070 - Failure!

I agree I dont' think it's necessary to run that here - we are done with that IW anyways no? On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Doesn't repro for me but I think it's related to LUCENE-5544; it's > happening in the very last part of IW.rollbackInternal: > > try {

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2446) Add checksums to Lucene segment files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13955129#comment-13955129 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2446: - I glanced at the patch again I t

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:17:51.403337] On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:14:57.063621] > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: >> Please vote for the second Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1. >> >> Download it here: >>

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2446) Add checksums to Lucene segment files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13955080#comment-13955080 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2446: - this is awesome - robert do you t

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:19:30.322652] I upgraded elasticsearch and tests are passing [1] [1] https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/tree/upgrade/lucene_4_7_1 On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Martijn v Groningen wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [2:38:57.708807] > > > On 26 March 2014 13:11, Shalin Shekh

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-5553. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.8 Assignee

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5553: Attachment: LUCENE-5553.patch next iter adresssin shais comments and adds a changes entry

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946719#comment-13946719 ] Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-5553 at 3/25/14 4:0

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5553: Attachment: LUCENE-5553.patch next iteration. I cleaned up things a bit and got rid of

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5553: Attachment: LUCENE-5553.patch here is a patch that adds a tests for the index reader

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5553) IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close()

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5553: --- Summary: IndexReader#ReaderClosedListener is not always called on IndexReader#close() Key: LUCENE-5553 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5544) exceptions during IW.rollback can leak files and locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13943057#comment-13943057 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5544: - I think the patch looks awesome..

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942910#comment-13942910 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - I think this looks great +1 to co

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4984) Fix ThaiWordFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942382#comment-13942382 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4984: - I really like the base class!

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942377#comment-13942377 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - yeah it can wait I guess - pleas

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942278#comment-13942278 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - oh I see the Float was to ma

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942272#comment-13942272 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - hey mike, thanks for the new pat

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939079#comment-13939079 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - I'd be totally ok with ski

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5489) Add query rescoring API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939069#comment-13939069 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5489: - it's awesome that we are ad

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5532) AutomatonQuery.hashCode is not thread safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13937585#comment-13937585 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5532: - +1 to the patch - I agree with

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2878) Allow Scorer to expose positions and payloads aka. nuke spans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13936240#comment-13936240 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2878: - Now we are talking Sent fro

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-5519. - Resolution: Fixed > Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearc

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5519: Attachment: LUCENE-5519.patch here is a new patch moving closer to TopDocs again.I don&#

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5519: Attachment: LUCENE-5519.patch next iteration... I added a new class TopResults that

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13930950#comment-13930950 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5519: - yeah I like the `isPartial=True|F

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5519: Attachment: LUCENE-5519.patch here is a patch > Make queueDepth enforcing optional

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5519) Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5519: --- Summary: Make queueDepth enforcing optional in TopNSearcher Key: LUCENE-5519 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5519 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5516) Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-5516. - Resolution: Fixed > Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeSchedu

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b07) - Build # 9759 - Failure!

argh missed to svn add a file - just committed a fix sorry for the noise On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/9759/ > Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b07 -client -XX:+UseG1GC > > No tests ran. > > Build Log: >

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5516) Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5516: Attachment: LUCENE-5516.patch here is an updated patch fixing the naming. Thanks for

Re: ant idea on fresh checkout of 4.7

watch out Grant is back ;) Welcome! :) simon On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hi, > > I did a fresh checkout of 4.7 from SVN and ran ant idea at the top level and > I get [1]. I presume I am missing the CDH Ivy repo somewhere. Any one have > the bits that need to be

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5502) equals method of TermsFilter might equate two different filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13926085#comment-13926085 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5502: - LGTM as well! thanks for fixin

Re: [VOTE] Move to Java 7 in Lucene/Solr 4.8, use Java 8 in trunk (once officially released)

I agree with you on the fact that we should always try to innovate. Moving to Java8 is innovation and we should do it rather sooner than later. I just don't think we should move there right before it's even released. I can totally see this vote coming in in a couple of month once we have fixed the

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-5516) Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-5516: --- Assignee: Simon Willnauer > Forward information that trigger a merge

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5516) Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5516: Attachment: LUCENE-5516.patch here is a patch > Forward information that trigger a me

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5516) Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5516: --- Summary: Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler Key: LUCENE-5516 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516 Project: Lucene

Re: [VOTE] Move to Java 7 in Lucene/Solr 4.8, use Java 8 in trunk (once officially released)

@Furkan, thanks for sharing your thoughts and giving insights. I am happy that you agree that we should move to Java 1.7 even if you had the trouble with your legacy code. That is the right way to go here! Regarding the vote: +1 for moving to Java 1.7 on 4.x -1 for moving to Java 8 on trunk I t

Re: Release Lucene 5?

+1 that is the right thing to do. Let move forward Java 6 went EOL and it's a security risk for all running it since security fixes are not ported anymore afaik. We should just move on here to be honest! simon On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Ok, then let’s release 4.8 usin

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-5478) Allow CommonTermsQuery to create custom term queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer closed LUCENE-5478. --- Resolution: Fixed > Allow CommonTermsQuery to create custom term quer

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5478) Allow CommonTermsQuery to create custom term queries

Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5478: --- Summary: Allow CommonTermsQuery to create custom term queries Key: LUCENE-5478 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5478 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5478) Allow CommonTermsQuery to create custom term queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5478: Attachment: LUCENE-5478.patch here is a patch > Allow CommonTermsQuery to create cus

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 4.7.0 released.

February 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.7 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.7 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted searc

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 4.7.0 released.

February 2014, Apache Lucene™ 4.7 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 4.7 Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5775) Disable constantly failing solr tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13912884#comment-13912884 ] Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-5775: --- I wrote a mail about this during buil

Re: Lucene 4.7 release notes

LGTM thanks for doing it steve - I would have done it today. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Looks good, thanks Steve. > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Robert Muir wrote: >> +1, thanks for doing this! >> >> On Feb 25, 2014 2:58 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote: >>> >>> First p

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC4

this vote passed - thanks guys On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Smoke tester was happy, and docs, changes and javadocs look good. > > Steve > > On Feb 22, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > >> Please vote for the forth

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5463) Make RamUsageEstimator.(human)sizeOf(Object) a forbidden API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13910482#comment-13910482 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-5463: - Thanks so much adrien! +1 to co

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC4

it to https without some manual workaround steps. You can create a fresh > cluster with SSL with no manual workaround steps though. > > - Mark > > http://about.me/markrmiller > > On Feb 23, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > >> mark, I am a bit confused - t

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

aphi.de > > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:01 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3 >> >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:39

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC4

will need to shutdown their servers, migrate the cluster state’s >> base_url from http to https and bring the server back up. >> >> -Steve >> >> On Feb 22, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Simon Willnauer >> wrote: >> >>> Please vote for the forth Release Candidate

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I’ve been sick and am sick, so take it for what it’s worth with my head > swirling, but I wrote down a few of my thoughts on releases. > > It’s all encompassed in a big “in my opinion”. It’s not necessarily to refute > anyone or argue with an

[VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC4

Please vote for the forth Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.0 you can download it here: http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.7.0-RC4-rev1570806/ or run the smoke tester directly with this commandline (don't forget to set JAVA6_HOME etc.): $ python3.2 -u dev-tools/script

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

n > > > You can respin a build > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: >> >> Thanks nobel! can you please ping me here so I can kick off another RC. >> >> Regarding the bugs that should / should not block a release I think >> it

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

m working on a test case for 5762 I'll commit it tomorrow IST > > On 21 Feb 2014 20:05, "Simon Willnauer" wrote: >> >> So the problem here is where to draw the line. I think in a setup like >> we have with lucene and solr in one codebase the chance to hit a b

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

ng. I’m sure it’ll be fine either > way. > > Steve > > On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > >> Guys, I don't think we will ever get to the point where there is not a >> bug. But we have to draw a line here. If we respin I have to st

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

Guys, I don't think we will ever get to the point where there is not a bug. But we have to draw a line here. If we respin I have to step back as the RM since I just can't spend more than 7 days on this. I think there should be a 4.7.1 at some point where you can get your bugs fixed as everybody els

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

ges in Runtime Behavior" should be LUCENE-5399 instead of > LUCENE-4399. > > > On 21 February 2014 02:50, Mark Miller wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:05:52.694842] >> >> - Mark >> >> http://about.me/markrmiller >> >> On Feb

[VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

Please vote for the third Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.0 you can download it here: http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.7.0-RC3-rev1570248/ or run the smoke tester directly with this commandline (don't forget to set JAVA6_HOME etc.): $ python3.2 -u dev-tools/scrip

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >