Hi all, Apparently there is an extension of the deadline so in the meanwhile if somebody has ideas about the logo feel free to share. I can give it another try although I cannot promise anything about the final outcome :P
Best, Stamatis On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:00 PM <baris.ka...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan,- > > I very much appreciate this oppurtunity to submit my designs. > > Best regards > > > On 6/18/20 1:29 AM, Ryan Ernst wrote: > > > IMHO this vote is invalid because... > > > it doesn’t include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver > > > > I considered the latest submission by Dustin Haver to be his > > submission, but I can see how some might like the other better and it > > should have been part of the vote. > > > > > I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions. > > > > Given that I omitted the submission above, that seems reasonable. And > > since we are restarting, I guess we can allow Baris to add in an entry. > > > > Baris, please add your entry to the jira issue. I will restart the > > vote next week. > > > > > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting" > > > > I considered rank voting, but tallying a rank vote by hand can be > > incredibly tedious. I don't think we should use any external tools > > since that prohibits verification on who is voting from the PMC. > > However, given the lastingness of this decision, I guess it is fair to > > do the necessary harder tallying work of rank choice voting over > > email. When I restart the vote, I will give instructions on making > > multiple selections. > > > > So, consider this vote CLOSED and VOID. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:27 AM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com > > <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked > > voting": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting > > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVxqtj8TA$ > > > > > > If you create a Google Form based submission which supports a > > ranked choice input, then this should make it probably not hard to > > tally the results correctly. A PMC boolean would be helpful too. > > > > ~ David > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Andrzej Białecki <a...@getopt.org > > <mailto:a...@getopt.org>> wrote: > > > > IMHO this vote is invalid because it doesn’t include all > > submissions linked to that issue. Specifically, it doesn’t > > include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver > > (which I personally prefer over the sickly green ones … ;) ) > > > > I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions. > > > >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 17:04, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> A. (PMC) I like that it retains the same idea as our current > >> logo with a more modern look. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:58 PM Andi Vajda <o...@ovaltofu.org > >> <mailto:o...@ovaltofu.org>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> C. (current logo) > >> > >> Andi.. (pmc) > >> > >>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 15:08, Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net > >>> <mailto:r...@iernst.net>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! > >>> > >>> In February a contest was started to design a new logo > >>> for Lucene [1]. That contest concluded, and I am now > >>> (admittedly a little late!) calling a vote. > >>> > >>> The entries are labeled as follows: > >>> > >>> A. Submitted by Dustin Haver [2] > >>> > >>> B. Submitted by Stamatis Zampetakis [3] Note that this > >>> has several variants. Within the linked entry there are > >>> 7 patterns and 7 color palettes. Any vote for B should > >>> contain the pattern number, like B1 or B3. If a B > >>> variant wins, we will have a followup vote on the color > >>> palette. > >>> > >>> C. The current Lucene logo [4] > >>> > >>> Please vote for one of the three (or nine depending on > >>> your perspective!) above choices. Note that anyone in > >>> the Lucene+Solr community is invited to express their > >>> opinion, though only Lucene+Solr PMC cast binding votes > >>> (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). This > >>> vote will close one week from today, Mon, June 22, 2020. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221 > >>> < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVF6FgMug$ > > > >>> [2] > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen%20Shot%202020-04-10%20at%208.29.32%20AM.png > >>> < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen*20Shot*202020-04-10*20at*208.29.32*20AM.png__;JSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaU-0OqLrw$ > > > >>> [3] > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf > >>> < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaXc3KyVbA$ > > > >>> [4] > >>> > https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png > >>> < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVcq8T-BA$ > > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Adrien > > >