Re: Help cleaning up the Old Moin wiki content

Added you to the Lucene space, do you also want to work on Solr’s? On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 7:45 AM Adam Walz wrote: > Bumping this thread. > I'd like to help clean up the Lucene wiki site. Can I please get edit > rights for username adamwalz? > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:20 PM Adam Walz

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome, Atri! On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:05 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Atri! > > -- > Steve > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 3:11 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Please join me in welcoming Atri Sharma as Lucene/ Solr committer! > > > > If you are following activity

Re: The Gradle train.

+1 to merge soon Mark. Thanks for working on this. On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:03 AM Eric Pugh wrote: > Hack-a-thon is a great thought…. We haven’t had a chance to publicize it > widely yet, but Charlie Hull has set up another “pre Activate” hack-a-thon, > similar to others he has organized. > >

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov as Lucene/ Solr committer

Welcome Michael! On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:21 PM Yonik Seeley wrote: > Congrats Mike! > -Yonik > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:23 PM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> Thanks Dawid, and thank you to everyone who voted to grant me access >> to this awesome project! >> >> I spent many years building

Re: Using util.Optional instead of a raw null?

In general, I'm +1. I think we may want to be careful in the cases where too many objects would be created, like when iterating docs/values, etc. That specific case you link to would be a good candidate in my mind. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:20 AM Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:27 PM Christian Moen wrote: > Congratulations, Tomoko-san! > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:20 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Tomoko Uchida as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer! >> >> She has been working on

Re: 6.6.6 Release

Thanks for working on this Ishan, I'll commit SOLR-13301 into the branch too. On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:13 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have backported the following: > SOLR-10506 (Memory leak) > SOLR-12770 ("shards" security fix) > SOLR-12514

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC4

SUCCESS! [1:13:11.720840] +1 Thanks Jim! On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:38 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > > I did the same tests like last time. Here the results: > > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/18/console > > SUCCESS! [2:36:19.284235] > > > > The testing was

Re: VOTE: Release Apache Solr Ref Guide for 7.7

+1 On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:14 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for doing this, Jason! > > *  *Anshum > > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 7:28 AM, Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > > Please vote to release the Solr Ref Guide for 7.7. > > The PDF artifacts can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3

I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available. -0 On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.1 RC1

Just a bit late... +1 SUCCESS! [1:08:18.463882] On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:49 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > The vote has passed. I'll release the artifacts shortly. > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:42 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:38:56.734117] >> >> On

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski to the PMC

Welcome Jason! On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:57 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Jason! > > > On 22 Feb 2019, at 15:21, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Jason Gerlowski has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > > > Welcome Jason! > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl, search

Re: [lucene-solr] branch master updated: Fix escaping in Solr Reference Guide

Thanks Alan! On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:46 AM wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > romseygeek pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:05:29.028759] On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:20 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Oh, I missed to give my explicit +1! > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Uwe Schindler > *Sent:* Wednesday,

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

I think the UI is an important Solr feature. As long as there is a reasonable time horizon for the issue being resolved I'm +1 on making it a blocker. I'm not familiar enough with the UI code to help either unfortunately. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:24 AM Gus Heck wrote: > It looks like someone

Re: Re: Re: Admin UI - Collections Management

Thanks Jeremy, Yes, you should create a Jira. Then you can create the PR (and include the Jira code in the title of the PR, this will link them). Also, I’d suggest you create different JIRAs for each individual change. Small changes are easier and more likely to be reviewed/ merged. On Mon, Jan

Re: Welcome Nick Knize to the PMC

Welcome Nick! On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:51 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > Welcome Nick! > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Welcome Nick!! >> >> Mike >> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC chair, Cassandra Targett

Congratulations, Cassandra! On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 1:43 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Congratulations, Cassandra! > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:37 AM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Congrats Cassandra!! >> >> Mike >> >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 5:32 PM Karl Wright

Re: Proposed Additional Hooks in SolrEventListener

Hi Kevin, Isn't UpdateRequestProcessor enough for what you need? On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:29 PM Kevin Jia wrote: > bounce > -- > *From:* Kevin Jia > *Sent:* December 12, 2018 6:36:33 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Proposed Additional Hooks in

Re: VOTE: Solr Reference Guide for Solr 7.6 RC1

+1 On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:29 PM Chris Hostetter wrote: > > +1 > > : Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:36:46 -0600 > : From: Cassandra Targett > : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org > : To: dev@lucene.apache.org > : Subject: VOTE: Solr Reference Guide for Solr 7.6 RC1 > : > : Please vote for the

Re: lucene-solr:jira/gradle: Parallel running tests

My understanding is that the integration is not bidirectional (i.e. we can't use the "merge PR" green button in GitHub and make that a commit in the official repo). You can build PRs if you want, and then you can either turn that into a patch or cherry pick into the offical repo, but that's about

Re: Welcome Tim Allison as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Tim! On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:39 AM Tim Allison wrote: > Back at you, Gus! ; > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:21 PM Gus Heck wrote: > >> Congratulations, and welcome, Tim :) >> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:11 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: >> >>> Congratulations and welcome, Tim! :) >>> >>> * 

Re: Welcome Gus Heck as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Gus! On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:07 AM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > Welcome Gus! > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:06 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Gus! >> >> *  *Anshum >> >> >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 5:22 AM, David Smiley >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, I'd like to commit SOLR-12766 to 7.5. SOLR-11881 added retries for internal requests, but the backoff time in cases with multiple updates can become big, and cause clients to timeout. The change is minimal, just backoff once for a retry batch instead of for every doc. I'm testing a patch

Re: Welcome Nhat Nguyen as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Nhat! On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Welcome, Nhat! > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 4:27 AM Nhat Nguyen > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Thank you for all warm welcomes :). I am happy and excited to join the >> force as a committer. >> >> I was born and raised in

Re: How do we interpret replicationFactor ?

I think we should deprecate it. There were some concerns about this because new users would understand quickly what "replicationFactor" is, while "nrtReplicas" is not so intuitive, but I don't like having two ways to do the same, and now that there are multiple types of replicas I think it's

Re: Review Request 67203: SOLR-12373: DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessor doesn't work when schema has required fields

Fernández Löbbe

Review Request 67203: SOLR-12373: DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessor doesn't work when schema has required fields

/SolrTestCaseJ4.java 9fec7e64d6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67203/diff/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 66967: SolrCmdDistributor retries requestss from leader to followers

--- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 66967: SolrCmdDistributor retries requestss from leader to followers

Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 66967: SolrCmdDistributor retries requestss from leader to followers

/solr/update/SolrCmdDistributorTest.java 1699b0d70d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66967/diff/2/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66967/diff/1-2/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 66967: SolrCmdDistributor retries requestss from leader to followers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66967/#review202485 ------- On May 4, 2018, 7:49 p.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > >

Review Request 66967: SolrCmdDistributor retries requestss from leader to followers

: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66967/diff/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: InterruptedException handling between solr->zk interactions

Yes, I've seen these issues too. The right thing to do is to close all resources (in some cases finish anything that can't be left in a bad state) and exit. In this particular case I'd think the InterruptedException is swallowed unintentionally because of the catch (Exception ). I suspect for the

Re: Review Request 66587: SOLR-11277: Add auto hard commit setting based on tlog size

utoCommitTest.java Lines 203 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66587/#comment281972> Is this @Repeat intended to stay? - Tomás Fernández Löbbe On April 12, 2018, 2:57 p.m., Anshum Gupta wrote: > > --- > Th

Re: Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

/ShardParams.java cbc33f41f4 solr/solrj/src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/CloudSolrClientTest.java e54f9ad7c6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/diff/3/ Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/diff/2-3/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

pache/solr/handler/component/HttpShardHandlerFactoryTest.java Lines 31 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/#comment279173> Note that there is a `TestHttpShardHandlerFactory`, did you intentionally not use that one? - Tomás Fernández Löbbe On March 8, 2018, 5:38 p.m., Tom

Re: Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

de/src/distributed-requests.adoc Lines 149 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/#comment279002> ``[...]replicas in the given order of precedence``. Maybe add "within each shard"? Not sure if that's clear enough. WDYT? - Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Review Request 65942: SOLR-11982: Add support for shards.sort parameter

/CloudSolrClientTest.java 9539846f88 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65942/diff/1/ Testing --- Thanks, Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs > > Erick Erickson wrote: > It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which > means we can (and do)

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs > > Erick Erickson wrote: > It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which > means we can (and do)

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

> On March 3, 2018, 4:41 a.m., Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > > LGTM. I think you need to add org.apache.logging.log4j.** to forbidden APIs > > Erick Erickson wrote: > It turns out not. Thanks to Shawn I now know the shim is used, which > means we can (and do)

Re: Review Request 65888: Upgrade Solr to use Log4J2

rized? (applies to other entries in this file too) solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/logging/log4j2/Log4j2WatcherTest.java Lines 88-89 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65888/#comment278777> assertTrue? - Tomás Fernández Löbbe On March 3, 2018,

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski as committer

Welcome Jason! On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Christian Moen wrote: > Congrats, Jason! > > Christian > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:03 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> It's my pleasure to announce that Jason Gerlowski is our latest

Re: Welcome Ahmet Arslan as Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations and welcome Ahmet! On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to all for the warm welcome. > It is such an honor to be invited by the PMC. > > > I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Engineering at >

Re: Welcome Ishan Chattopadhyaya to the PMC

Welcome Ishan! On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Welcome Ishan! > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:39 AM, David Smiley > wrote: > > Welcome Ishan! Well deserved. > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:47 AM Adrien Grand

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.0.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:49.127245] On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:11 AM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:52:40.786442] > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:28 AM Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [2:16:41.101128] >> >> Il giorno mar 3

Re: Welcome Hrishikesh Gadre as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Christian Moen wrote: > Congrats! > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:23 PM Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Hrishikesh Gadre as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Hrishikesh, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [0:44:22.517203] Thanks for working on this Anshum! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > SUCCESS! [4:47:50.042814] > > +1 for me too, then a quick bugfix release which includes also SOLR-11348 > > Il giorno lun 11 set 2017 alle ore

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 6.6.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:43:39.770376] On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > +1 > > -Yonik > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Varun Thacker wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.1 > > > > The artifacts can be

Re: JIRA Status - Finding Patch Submissions

e is set automatically, how do we know when to set it? > > Maybe this could be an extra (optional?) step for the committer looking at > the issue? Change to "Patch Available" triggers a run on the most recent > attached patch? > > Mike > > On Wed, May 17, 2017

Re: JIRA Status - Finding Patch Submissions

> Additionally, we could use that to start running precommit checks on Jenkins whenever a new patch is put up. This is a good idea, but we don't want to do this for every patch I'd say. We encourage people to submit patches early, probably with failing tests and nocommits. We probably want an

Re: Welcome Mike Drob as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Mike! On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > Welcome Mike! > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Welcome Mike! >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >> >

Re: Release planning for 7.0

One thing I'd like to get to 7.0 is replica types (SOLR-10233). Most of the work is done, I'm working on more tests right now. If everything works fine I should be committing that some time next week. Tomás On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:33 AM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > >

Re: Strange Solr JIRA versions

Isn't the PMC group required to see issues with security level "private"? On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Cassandra Targett wrote: > I'm also +1 to removing PMC group - I checked and every permission PMC > group has, administrators also have so consolidating those 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:31.259827] Thanks Joel! On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47 AM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:18.176212] > > If there is a respin for any reason, I'd suggest including LUCENE-7769 (UH > boost query) and SOLR-10439 ('large' and SchemaField) > > ~

Re: 6.5.1 release?

I'd also like to include SOLR-10425. PointFields ignore indexed="false". We are working on a fix and some more tests with Hoss. Should be committed between today and tomorrow On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > I’d like to include SOLR-10423. It’s a bug fix

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:39:59.070517] On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:27 AM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > > SUCCESS! [1:02:15.276954] > > Thanks for being the RM Jim. > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:55 PM jim ferenczi > wrote: > >> Please vote for release

Re: Release 6.5

I'd like to include SOLR-10237, Poly-fields can provide incorrect results if subfields are point fields with docValues=true. This is specially tricky since the users will get results, but will sometimes be incorrect, and the only way out is to modify the field type and reindex. I already have a

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:39:00.462019] On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:33:35.205071] > Windows 10 Core i7 > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr

Re: Welcome Toke Eskildsen as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Toke! On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > Thank you for the invitation and the warm welcome. > > > I am a 43 year old Danish man, with a family and a job at the Royal Danish > Library, where I have been working mostly with search-related technology >

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Cassandra On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Cassandra Targett wrote: > Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4. > > Artifacts are available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref- >

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4

+1 eyeballed all the pages and read some random sections. Two minor things I caught (not for respin), some of the examples in LTR for some reason are very narrow (pages 355 to 365). We still talk about DismaxRequestHandler in "Overview of Searching in Solr", and we even say it's the default. I'll

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

+1 to release if we know it's a test issue SUCCESS! [0:48:00.183141] On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 to release. > > My smoke tester also hit that same test failure, but it doesn't look > like a release stopper... > > Mike McCandless >

Re: Language Detection Individual Field Mapping Bug

Thanks Will, This does look like a bug and I also couldn't find a Jira issue for it. Feel free to create one. Tomás On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Will Martin wrote: > Hello, > > While using Solr 6.0.4 I noticed that the org.apache.solr.update. >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7

> The other solution, delaying removal until 8.0, doesn't sound like a bad idea either. I think that's what everyone is saying here, legacy numeric types will be supported in Solr at least until 8.0. It could happen that they are moved from Lucene to Solr, but will for sure be supported during the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7

I think it would be great if we could use 7.0 to make point fields the default in Solr (i.e. change the example/default schemas to make "int", "long" etc use point fields implementation), but in order to do that, there are a number of point-related Jiras that need to be solved (MultiValued DV

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.0 RC?

I did not see an entry in CHANGES.txt that could be related so I suspect this was not intentional. I created SOLR-9982 to investigate. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Core Plugin/Stats section of the Solr UI seems broken to

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.0 RC?

The Core Plugin/Stats section of the Solr UI seems broken to me in 6.4 (and master). A bunch o new sections added that are empty. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:07:22.678114] > > Kevin Risden > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:54

Re: Welcome Cao Manh Dat as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Dat! On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Welcome Dat! > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > > Congratulations! > > > > > > On Monday, January 9, 2017, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> > >> Welcome

Re: Welcome Jim Ferenczi as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Jim! On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Welcome Jim! > > Tommaso > > Il giorno lun 2 gen 2017 alle ore 02:53 Joel Bernstein > ha scritto: > >> Welcome Jim! >> >> Joel Bernstein >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >> >>

Re: Welcome Mikhail Khludnev to the PMC

Welcome Mikhail! On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Welcome Mikhail! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that

Re: Welcome Christine Poerschke to the PMC

Welcome Christine! On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Congrats Christine! > > -Yonik > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Christine Poerschke has accepted the PMC's > > invitation

Re: Welcome Varun Thacker to the Apache Lucene/Solr PMC

Congrats Varun! On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:14 PM, David Smiley wrote: > Congrats & Welcome Varun! > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Varun Thacker has accepted the PMC's >> invitation

Re: Welcome Ishan Chattopadhyaya as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ishan! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Welcome Ishan! > > Regards, > Tommaso > > Il giorno mar 29 nov 2016 alle ore 19:33 Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > LONDON) ha scritto: > >> Welcome Ishan! >> >>

Re: Collection API for performance monitoring?

If you only need query/update performance you could aggregate the logs too. If you need more information, I like what was proposed in SOLR-9641, that would allow you do collect and aggregate metrics for internal components too. Tomás On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Walter Underwood

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for Solr 6.3, RC3

LGTM. +1 On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > > Please VOTE for the 3rd release candidate of the Apache Solr Reference > > Guide for

Re: [VOTE] - Release Lucene/Solr 6.3.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:34.743909] On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [1:02:33.485442] > > Le jeu. 3 nov. 2016 à 00:19, Steve Rowe a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Smoke tester passed (lost the timing in a closed terminal window, it was >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:36.664736] On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:54:37.401807] > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:08 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > >> Please vote for the first release candidate for

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:19.038459] On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:48:41.677282] > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:29:00.305991] > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl,

Re: Proposal to Move Solr Ref Guide off Confluence

Thanks for taking time for looking at these options Casandra. I specially agree with the third of the painful points you mentioned, the fact that we can't maintain online documentation for different versions. I like that we have a released PDF version for every minor version, but 99.9% of the time

Re: Welcome Alexandre Rafalovitch as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Alexandre!! On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Welcome Alexandre! > > Uwe > > Am 7. August 2016 00:49:50 MESZ, schrieb "Jan Høydahl" < > jan@cominvent.com>: > >I'm pleased to announce that Alexandre Rafalovitch has accepted the > >Lucene PMC's

Re: FYI: Lucene website publishing is stuck; 5.5.2 news items aren't in production yet

I can see 5.5.2 in Solr news now On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > The publishing process finally finished and the top-level and Lucene 5.5.2 > news items are visible now. Not sure why the Solr one isn’t yet, since > it’s on lucene.staging.apache.org... > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157] On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> >> > On May 25, 2016, at

Re: jira git bot skipping janhoy -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9053) Upgrade fileupload-commons to 1.3.1

I believe it may be a problem with special characters (in the author name?). I had the same issue On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, David Smiley wrote: > Not even on master or 6x branches? That'd be weird. FYI no commits to > branches matching /(lucene|solr)-.*/ will

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-6.0.pdf

+1 Not a blocker, but looks like many times images are broken into 2 pages (happens for example for many of the admin UI screenshot, but also with smaller images like in the Spatial Filers section). Is there a way to prevent this in Confluence? Also, we should try to prevent pasting extremely

Re: Welcome Scott Blum as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Scott! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Congrats Scott! Welcome aboard! > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > Congrats, Scott! Well deserved! > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Shawn Heisey

Re: Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

. > > Best regards, > > Christian Moen > アティリカ株式会社 > https://www.atilika.com > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 15:12, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Christian, > I don't have a different use case, but If what I said is the expected > beh

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] > Ahmet > > > On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking this up Nick! > > Here's my

Re: Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

hem to see how we can improve things. > > Many thanks, > > Christian Moen > アティリカ株式会社 > https://www.atilika.com > > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 04:39, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > If I understand correctly, the user diction

Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

If I understand correctly, the user dictionary in the JapaneseTokenizer allows users to customize how a stream is broken into tokens using a specific set of rules provided like: AABBBCC -> AA BBB CC It does not allow users to change any of the characters like: AABBBCC -> DD BBB CC (this will

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Karl! On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote: > welcome Karl. > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > >> would like to hear more on how to search GIS Objects using Lat/Long inputs >> my immediate interest is

Re: Welcome Kevin Risden as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Kevin! On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: > Thanks for the warm welcome. Its an honor to be invited to work on > this project and with so many great people. > > Bio: > I graduated from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2012. My >

Re: GIT migration date (SVN freeze)

My understanding is that squashed merges also keep the linear history. You do loose the branch commit history, but if that's not something you are interested in keeping that should be fine, right? That's the workflow that Dawid proposed and it's the one I've been using so far with git. Tomás On

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:27:55.987215] On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > +1 > > -Yonik > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 > > > > This release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.3.2-RC2

SUCCESS! [1:16:42.067861] +1 On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:30:48.710775] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.3.2-RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:10.001165] On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Thanks Shalin! > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < > shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Upayavira made some fixes to the smoke tester on the 5.4 branch to >>

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett to the Lucene / Solr PMC

Congrats Cassandra! On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome Cassandra! > > Koji > > > On 2015/12/25 0:54, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Cassandra has accepted the PMC's invitation >> to join. >> >> Welcome Cassandra!

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.4.pdf

+1. Looks good. Thanks! On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 to release. > > Thanks Cassandra. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Cassandra Targett > wrote: > >> Please VOTE to release the Apache Solr Ref Guide for Solr 5.4: >>

<    1   2   3   >