[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-19 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi, Christine. I accepted your pull request and will update my branch from the master later today. Will also take a look at the tests in DQCCST. Thanks, Judith

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-18 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi, Christine. Sounds good---I hope to have time this evening to catch up with the collaboration business. Thanks for fixing the indentation in your most recent commit on your fork. I

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #189: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
GitHub user jitka18 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Jira/solr 6203 Hello, Christine. I merged from master though commit 00f0c30 to my fork of the jira/solr-6203 branch, resolved a conflict in TopGroupsFieldCommand.java, and committed. Unit

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #177: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/177 Closing this request in hopes of opening an updated request. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #177: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/177 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #188: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/188 Github seems to think that I requested a pull to master --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #188: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/188 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #188: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
GitHub user jitka18 reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/188 Jira/solr 6203 Hello, Christine. I merged from master through commit 00f0c3022baa0b7 to my fork of the jira/solr-6203 branch, resolved a conflict in TopGroupsFieldCommand.java

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #188: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
Github user jitka18 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/188 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #188: Jira/solr 6203

2017-04-16 Thread jitka18
GitHub user jitka18 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/188 Jira/solr 6203 Hello, Christine. I merged from master through commit 00f0c3022baa0b7 to my fork of the jira/solr-6203 branch, resolved a conflict in TopGroupsFieldCommand.java, and committed

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #177: Jira/solr 6203

2017-03-28 Thread jitka18
GitHub user jitka18 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/177 Jira/solr 6203 Christine, I created a fork of the repo and updated our branch from master last weekend. There were conflicts in SearchGroupsResultTransformer.java, which I resolved. After