Hi Mike, I found a new issue in Solr SQL (SOLR-16227) and have a fix for it ( https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/887). Can you wait on the release for 8.11.2 till I can backport this?
Thank you, Kiran. On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:21 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > Howdy folks, now that Lucene 9.2 has wrapped and we're past the holiday > weekend in the United States, I'd like to take a look at getting this > rolling by the end of the week. I see an open PR for > backporting LUCENE-10236 but it doesn't look like anything else would > really be waiting at the moment. > > I will plan to build a release candidate on Thursday (sooner if > LUCENE-10236 is committed, later if somebody else shouts that they have > other issues). > > Thanks! > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:48 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> I bumped Jackson in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16213 and >> also backported to 8_11. Wdyt? >> >> Jan >> >> 18. mai 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>: >> >> SOLR-16194 is in and ported to 8.11,.2 >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:12 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I was pinged on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16019 because >>> I have an in-flight PR with a backport. I'll complete and merge that PR. >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> 13. mai 2022 kl. 01:03 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>: >>> >>> To: dev@lucene, dev@solr >>> >>> NOTICE: >>> >>> I am planning on preparing a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11 >>> (likely mid next week) >>> >>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: >>> >>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue >>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. >>> ** If you're backporting stuff this week still or over the weekend, then >>> skip >>> the bit about how long it will take. >>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.11.2 >>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as >>> Blocker >>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed >>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into >>> the current release branch. >>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.2 and priority "Blocker" will >>> delay >>> a release candidate build. >>> >>> Also, please observe that since 9.0 already exists, there cannot be any >>> index format breaking changes. It really should only be bug fixes that have >>> already been verified on the 9x branch. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> >> >>