Github user markrmiller commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/486#discussion_r229525959
--- Diff:
solr/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/solr/cloud/MiniSolrCloudCluster.java ---
@@ -265,10 +281,30 @@ public MiniSolrCloudCluster(int
Github user markrmiller commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/486#discussion_r229525878
--- Diff: solr/core/src/test-files/solr/solr.xml ---
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@
127.0.0.1
${hostPort:8983}
${hostContext:solr
GitHub user markrmiller opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/486
SOLR-12801: Fix the tests, remove BadApples and AwaitsFix annotationsâ¦
â¦, improve env for test development.
SOLR-12804: Remove static modifier from Overseer queue access
Github user markrmiller commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/34
Sorry, still have the same objection. I am not really on board with this,
"let's make core as slim as possible and put pressure on devs to not use
libs." This is not Lucen
Github user markrmiller commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/34#issuecomment-217559403
We only have the needs of an hdfs client for shipping. I filed an issue to
shrink that. Making a whole new contrib, extending the test running time,
making
Github user markrmiller commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/32#issuecomment-217291207
> Although, thinking more about that, we already have a separate executor
for watchers, don't we?
Yes, every watch firing event should run f
Github user markrmiller commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/34#issuecomment-217233476
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9075 to look at
shrinking the hdfs client dependency jars.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user markrmiller commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/34#issuecomment-217231828
I'm not currently for this change. HDFS is currently built in and supported
first class. I don't see a need to make anyone that wants to use it jump any
more
I was playing around with LUCENE-831 last night and think I may have run into
a bug?
Can anyone verify that this should work?
Open IndexWriter
AddDocs
Commit IndexWriter
Open Reader
SeeDocs
AddNewDocs
Commit IndexWriter
ReopenReader
SeeNewDocs
I have not been able to SeeNewDocs. The
