unsubscribe

Please unsubscribe .

Re: Solr search

/113392 - was helpful Thanks 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > > Dear Team, > > I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following > jar files, > > com

Solr search

Dear Team, I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following jar files, commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2 If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is valuable and appreciated. Thanks, Vetrik

Re: Solr search

Hi Upayavira, Thanks for your quick reply. Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT. Regards, Vetrik 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > > Dear

understanding SOLR 5.3.0

Hi Team, Can you please help me understand the following usage of below mentioned jar files, in apache Solr 5.3.0, 1. Tagsoup 1.2.1 2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13 3. com.googlecode.juniversalchardet v1.0.3 2. Is it right to ask , can we rebuild solr 5.3.0 without/replacing above mentioned files?

License in Solr

Hi Team, I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for all underlying licenses? example : junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT . Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send these questions to.. Regards, Vetrikkumaran Murugesan

Re: License in Solr

Thanks Upayavira, I was using apache solr 5.3.0. 2015-09-14 17:28 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for a