Yonik,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> The fix has been committed to the 45 branch.
> Given how much pain was caused the last time the binary format changed
> (the change from modified-UTF8 to normal UTF-8), I think this warrants
> a 4.5 re-spin.
Thanks for fixing this bug
The fix has been committed to the 45 branch.
Given how much pain was caused the last time the binary format changed
(the change from modified-UTF8 to normal UTF-8), I think this warrants
a 4.5 re-spin.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Folks...
SUCCESS! [1:04:30.537779]
+1 to release! thanks adrien!
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : : >
> http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
>
> Once i fixed the javadoc linter workarround to hte 4_5 branch, I
> found no other prob
Folks... I discovered a serious back compat issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5261
Looking into it now...
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
> candidate is that this R
: : >
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
Once i fixed the javadoc linter workarround to hte 4_5 branch, I
found no other problems with RC1 other then LUCENE-5233 -- and i certainly
don't think LUCENE-5233 is significant enough to warrant a re-spin.
: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
: > I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
:
: Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
yeah, sorry -- i ment to followup and forgot to hit send.
-Hoss
-
To u
+1, smoke tester is happy for me (Windows 7, 64-bit).
Shai
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
>
> Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> --
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additi
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> I *think* this means that we just need to backport r1522884 to the 4_5
> branch, but i don't think we need a re-spin.
Thanks for reporting this error. I agree this doesn't need a respin,
especially given that the fix is to ignor
: >
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
I'm seeing the same java6 javadoc validation error in smoke tester that
jenkins was complaining about.
sarowe pointed out that mccandless committed a workarround for this to the
4x branch, but that didn't get
1:56 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1
>
>
> Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
> candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
> commit from SOLR-4221:
> http://people.apache.org/~**jpoun
+1, including UI on IE10.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:56 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
> candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
> commit from SOLR-4221:
> http://people
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
commit from SOLR-4221:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
This vote is open until Tuesday.
Smoke tester was happy on my
14 matches
Mail list logo
