[mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:02 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using
Java
6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant
Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sanne Grinovero sanne.grinov...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
Run integration tests with:
- Hibernate Search
- Infinispan
On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think
otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6.
Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805. A lot of
people were hit by that one. I was very glad when SOLR-4805
If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6
rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env
variable.
- Mark
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
12:05 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6
rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env
variable.
- Mark
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM
On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java
6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME
env variable.
The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25.
6u26 is available.
Should have been in my experience, not imo - have had a cold for a week and
it’s getting to me.
bq. it could use the information it's been given about java 6.
I think it’s an Apache Ant thing.
JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME are Lucene smoke tester things.
- Mark
On Jan 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM,
+1
Run integration tests with:
- Hibernate Search
- Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene)
- Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene)
All perfect, great job!
(For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved)
Sanne
On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve Rowe
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
Here is my +1.
--
- Mark
+1
SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
Here is my +1.
--
- Mark
+1
SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following
+1
SUCCESS! [1:11:35.695571]
upgrade Elasticsearch to 4.1.6 and all tests pass
simon
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM,
+1 - passing smokeTestRelease
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
17. jan. 2014 kl. 18:13 skrev Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
Here
+1
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590]
Changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/
Here is my
14 matches
Mail list logo
