[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113885#comment-16113885
]
Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-10701 at 8/4/17 4:09 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[^SOLR-10701.patch] goes with test.
This provides usage for LUCENE-7835.
Here is the question: {{ToChildBlockJoinSortField}} in LUCENE-7835 allows
passing child docs where sort field values are supplied. However, I don't see
an easy way to pass it with Solr syntax
({{q=\{!child..}...&sort=parentfield(name) asc}}).
[~jove4015], does it seems useful as-is?
The patch also introduces {{BlockJoinParentQParser.AllParentsQuerySupplier}}
which is implemented by {{BlockJoinParentQParser.AllParentsAware}}
{{BlockJoinChildQParser.AllParentsAwareToChildQuery}}. I wonder whether it's
good enough to come in.
was (Author: mkhludnev):
[^SOLR-10701.patch] goes with test.
This provides usage for LUCENE-7835.
Here is the question: {{ToChildBlockJoinSortField}} in LUCENE-7835 allows
passing child docs where sort field values are supplied. However, I don't see
an easy way to pass it with Solr syntax
({{q=\{!child..}...&sort=parentfield(name) asc}}). [~jove4015], does it seems
useful as-is?
> sort=parentfield(name,{!child}) asc
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10701
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10701
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Attachments: SOLR-10701.patch, SOLR-10701.patch
>
>
> It's a twin-bro for SOLR-10521. When searching by {{\{!child}}} query we need
> to order kids by a parent field. {{sort=parentfield(name,$q) asc}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
