[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16208235#comment-16208235
]
nkeet shah commented on LUCENE-7538:
Erick, we are not using SOLR purely as a search engine. we are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16202707#comment-16202707
]
Erick Erickson commented on LUCENE-7538:
There are probably some a-priori limits, somewhere
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16202705#comment-16202705
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7538:
@nkeet see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16202681#comment-16202681
]
nkeet commented on LUCENE-7538:
---
Thanks for having this fixed. I have been using SOLR 6.1.0 for just about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15655055#comment-15655055
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7538:
Thank you for taking the time to report it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15654658#comment-15654658
]
Steve Chen commented on LUCENE-7538:
[~mikemccand] Thank you for getting this fixed so quickly!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15653745#comment-15653745
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7538:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15653739#comment-15653739
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7538:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15637193#comment-15637193
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7538:
bq. I think the code piece is in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15637022#comment-15637022
]
Steve Chen commented on LUCENE-7538:
[~mikemccand] I think the code piece is in
Erick,
I'm working with multiple users/clients that have documents at this size
(though I don't know "Eric B"). So it happens, and sometimes the bigger
the document, the more genuinely relevant it tends to be (I've seen this).
So it's a challenge. Sometimes big docs can be decomposed and then
I agree that more graceful handling is desirable, but I also have
to ask what _use_ indexing a single 800M document is.
If it's textual data it'll generate a hit very frequently, and will
likely be way down in the relevance list. If it's numerics, it'll
also likely be hit a lot. Will the users
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15636551#comment-15636551
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7538:
Unfortunately, yes, {{IndexWriter}} will still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15636513#comment-15636513
]
Eric B commented on LUCENE-7538:
[~mikemccand] thanks for the quick response on this.
with this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15635896#comment-15635896
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7538:
Thanks [~steve_chen_veeva]
I'll fix this logic
15 matches
Mail list logo
