[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16395179#comment-16395179 ]
Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-8199: -------------------------------------- Argh, scratch that, this is only true for bugfix releases. For minor and major releases we have two versions that are not released in the non-release branches so the leniency is needed. There is no way to know if a minor release that is not the latest in the major has been released or not so this leniency is needed. The release howto has been updated with a specific section about adding version for bugfix releases in the non-release branches, I don't have a better solution so I'll close this issue for now. > TestBackwardsCompatibility#testAllVersionsTested should fail if the version > of a bwc index is missing > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-8199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8199 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jim Ferenczi > Priority: Major > > There is a leniency in the test that makes the test pass if a bwc index > doesn't have a version associated to it: > {code:java} > // we could be missing up to 1 file, which may be due to a release that is in > progress > if (missingFiles.size() <= 1 && extraFiles.isEmpty()) { > // success > return; > } > {code} > I think this test can be removed since we add the new released version in the > non-release branches only after the release. Then we'd need to add the > released version *and* > the BWC test in the non-release branches in the same commit so that the test > never fails. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org