[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3967.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
> nuke AtomicReader.termDocsEnum(termState) and termPositionsEnum(termState)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3967
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3967.patch
>
>
> These are simply sugar methods anyway, and so expert that I don't think we
> need sugar here at all.
> If someone wants to get DocsEnum via a saved TermState they can just use
> TermsEnum!
> But having these public in AtomicReader i think is pretty confusing and
> overwhelming.
> In fact, nothing in Lucene even uses these methods, except a sole assert
> statement in PhraseQuery,
> which I think can be written more clearly anyway:
> {noformat}
> // PhraseQuery on a field that did not index
> // positions.
> if (postingsEnum == null) {
> - assert reader.termDocsEnum(liveDocs, t.field(), t.bytes(), state,
> false) != null: "termstate found but no term exists in reader";
> + assert te.seekExact(t.bytes(), false) : "termstate found but no
> term exists in reader";
> {noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
