I haven't looked at the issue/patch but if you think that it's
non-invasive, please go ahead and commit it.
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/22/2015 1:28 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> > Let's play nice with the release branch. :)
>
> I'd like to get SOLR-7585 into 5.2. Wi
On 5/22/2015 1:28 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Let's play nice with the release branch. :)
I'd like to get SOLR-7585 into 5.2. Will that be OK?
Thanks,
Shawn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additio
On 22 May 2015 at 17:28, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> The 5.2 branch has been created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_2/
Not on GitHub mirror yet. Slow link again I guess.
Regards,
Alex.
-
To
+1 on that. Low regression risk + high performance improvement = totally
worth it!
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Timothy Potter
wrote:
> Thanks Anshum!
>
> I have one more minor change to SOLR-6820 (which is already in the 5.2
> branch), but I was waiting on some feedback before increasing t
Thanks Anshum!
I have one more minor change to SOLR-6820 (which is already in the 5.2
branch), but I was waiting on some feedback before increasing the
default number of version buckets for the Solr UpdateLog. That fix is
in and I would like to commit that change, risk of regression is near
nil an
There is a minor bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7531
I'm committing that
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> The 5.2 branch has been created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_2/
>
> @Tim Potter: I know you want to get SOLR-
The 5.2 branch has been created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_5_2/
@Tim Potter: I know you want to get SOLR-7582 in and you'd mentioned to me
about it. feel free to commit that change to the branch.
If there's anything else that someone feels must go in with t
