grating-serviceloader-java-9-
> module-system/
> >
> > I am not sure if JDEPS figures this out automatically!
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.
we
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dawid Weiss
> > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 9:52 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev
> > Subje
lly!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 9:52 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: Approach towards solving split package issues
fore, you can see what
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> changes will be needed for analyzers-common (and core).
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2020年9
>>>>>> are required for that, while most of our analyzers and so
> on are in a
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> separate analysis module. Perhaps we will need to move some
> basic
> >> >>>>>>>>>>&
system with core only. However some basic analysis
>> >>>>>>>>>>> tools
>> >>>>>>>>>>> are required for that, while most of our analyzers and so on are
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
all
> >>>>>>>>>>> the analysis code into the analysis module and acknowledge
> that it is
> >>>>>>>>>>> a fundamental dependency (more essential than core, really).
> >>>>>>>&g
>>>> analyzers out of com.amazon.lucene.analysis? Or the reverse - move
>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>> the analysis code into the analysis module and acknowledge that it
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>
ore, really).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:26 AM Tomoko Uchida
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > yes, Jigsaw was on my
gt;>> >
>>>>>>>>> > yes, Jigsaw was on my mind too...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > > why not go ahead and try to clean it up right away?
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>
a strong +1 to clean this up!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > OK, maybe I should open two issues, one for Lucene and one for
>>>>>>>> Solr, and link existing wip issues to them.
>>>>>>>> > Once we start it, these will be blockers for 9.0.0
he changes or
>>>>>>> technical obstacles). Are there any objections or comments?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 2020年9月1日(火) 19:34 Uwe Schindler :
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>
ssue is that split packages make migrating to the
>>>>>> Java 9 module system impossible. It's not allowed to have same package
>>>>>> name
>>>>>> (with classes) in different JAR files.
>>>>>> >&g
Java
>>>>> 9 module system impossible. It's not allowed to have same package name
>>>>> (with classes) in different JAR files.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Some of those require to open up visibility of classes. Some split
>>>>&
's not allowed to have same package name
>>>> (with classes) in different JAR files.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Some of those require to open up visibility of classes. Some split
>>>> packages issues were done because of package privat
fects the test framework, although this
>>> is not such a big deal (I would exclude that for now), because you would
>>> never run UNIT tests inside a module system, only integration tests.
>>> >>
>>> >> So a strong +1 to clean this up!
&
>> is not such a big deal (I would exclude that for now), because you would
>> never run UNIT tests inside a module system, only integration tests.
>> >>
>> >> So a strong +1 to clean this up!
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >>
lude that for now), because you would
> never run UNIT tests inside a module system, only integration tests.
> >>
> >> So a strong +1 to clean this up!
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Breme
ever
>> run UNIT tests inside a module system, only integration tests.
>>
>> So a strong +1 to clean this up!
>> Uwe
>>
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>
//www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dawid Weiss
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:22 AM
> > To: Lucene Dev
> > Subject: Re: Approach towards solving split package issues?
> >
> > This is a big
Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:22 AM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: Approach towards solving split package issues?
>
> This is a
This is a big headache for many things. I wouldn't mind doing this
even for 9x. This is a major release, why not go ahead and try to
clean it up right away?
Dawid
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:50 PM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
>
> Hello devs,
>
> we have lots of package name conflicts (shared package
It was causing issues when I was building solr start resource website too.
So +1 on sorting it out.
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon., Aug. 31, 2020, 5:50 p.m. Tomoko Uchida, <
tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> we have lots of package name conflicts (shared package names) between
Hello devs,
we have lots of package name conflicts (shared package names) between
modules in the Lucene/Solr source tree. It is not only annoying for
devs/users but also indeed bad practice since Java 9 (according to my
understanding), and we already have some problems with Javadocs due to
these
24 matches
Mail list logo
