21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson
> <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> > getting a little
> > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
> > BadApple enabled), &quo
son
> <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
>> getting a little
>> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
>> BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a
onik
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson
> <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> > getting a little
> > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
should be opened specific to the issue?
-Yonik
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson
<erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> getting a little
> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones
urce" relating to a configset file that ought to be there.
>
> AFAICT there is no other "alias" related fails pending.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:01 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm going to change how I collect the badappl
Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:01 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> getting a little
> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
> BadApple enabled), "It come
> >> When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one.
> >>
> >>> On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> >>
; Erick
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one.
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
<erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
>> getting a little
>> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
>> BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a flash
When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one.
> On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
> getting a little
> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (e
I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After
getting a little
overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with
BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a flash!"" (points if you
know where that comes from, hint: Old music inv
I'm still trying to find the balance on how aggressively
to BadApple tests. There's a danger of BadApple-ing tests
that _should_ fail or are being worked on. So here's
my current proposal:
> I'll collect candidate failed tests through Tuesday of
each week, then try to publish the candidate list
12 matches
Mail list logo