Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-25 Thread Mark Miller
21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson > <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > > getting a little > > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with > > BadApple enabled), &quo

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-25 Thread Erick Erickson
son > <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After >> getting a little >> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with >> BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-25 Thread David Smiley
onik > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson > <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > > getting a little > > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-25 Thread Yonik Seeley
should be opened specific to the issue? -Yonik On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > getting a little > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-23 Thread Erick Erickson
urce" relating to a configset file that ought to be there. > > AFAICT there is no other "alias" related fails pending. > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:01 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I'm going to change how I collect the badappl

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-22 Thread David Smiley
Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:01 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > getting a little > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with > BadApple enabled), "It come

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-21 Thread Erick Erickson
> >> When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one. > >> > >>> On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > >>

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-21 Thread Alan Woodward
; Erick > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one. >> >>> On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-21 Thread Erick Erickson
<erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After >> getting a little >> overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with >> BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a flash

Re: BadApple candidates

2018-05-21 Thread Alan Woodward
When did TestLRUQueryCache fail? I haven’t seen that one. > On 21 May 2018, at 16:00, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After > getting a little > overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (e

BadApple candidates

2018-05-21 Thread Erick Erickson
I'm going to change how I collect the badapple candidates. After getting a little overwhelmed by the number of failure e-mails (even ignoring the ones with BadApple enabled), "It come to me in a vision! In a flash!"" (points if you know where that comes from, hint: Old music inv

BadApple candidates

2018-03-08 Thread Erick Erickson
I'm still trying to find the balance on how aggressively to BadApple tests. There's a danger of BadApple-ing tests that _should_ fail or are being worked on. So here's my current proposal: > I'll collect candidate failed tests through Tuesday of each week, then try to publish the candidate list