they had to do for us, but I don't see why it would
be an issue for them to do it for us
~Prescott
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0500
Subject: Re: Build CI Considerations
From: mhern...@o19s.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Something
On 2011-01-26, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
2) CI : oh hells yeah. My vision would be to setup something where the
automated conversion would be triggered by commits to the stable
branch of the java project. I think if we can construct this bit right
we can even really get down the road of
The guys at code better run a Team City CI which has been building Lucene.Net
for a while
I believe that DIGY set this up.
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/login.html
Glyn
On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-01-26, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
2) CI : oh hells yeah. My vision
No. It's Rune's work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b1820f4.10...@gmail.com%3E
DIGY
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glyn Darkin
Robert,
.
I don't believe this is necessary. At least there were no requests
for alternative build systems in the past.
There may never be a need for the alternative building scripts, its was more
of a curious question. I've seen a few projects on github use both albacore
and psake. Maybe it
Per Michael's suggestion I'm branching this off into a new thread.
I'll start by saying this is somewhere I think I could help alot --
I'm still a recovering liberal arts major so I can't claim to grok too
much of the underlying computer sciency bits. I've also spent as much
if not more time in IT
On build systems -- I think MSBuild can definitely get you where you'd
want to be -- the triple-targeted version I posted had a very rough
MSBuild deployment script. The alternative build systems really
start to shine in places we don't need the help -- we don't need to do
complex packaging, build
