On 03/16/2012 05:04 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
So close!
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-6077692575
Dawid
It's only close as a date. It is rather far away in practice. It is
developer only at this point.
Also, they are working on a Mac version, but I doubt
Maybe some time after the 4.x branch is created, the trunk can move to Java
7?
3.x branch supports Java 5, 4.x and current trunk support Java 6. Seems
natural to me that the future 5.x and future trunk would support Java 7...
Martijn
On 16 March 2012 15:50, Erick Erickson wrote:
> OK, that sett
OK, that settles that , 1.6 going forward.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Sorry, I misunderstood the original question...
>
> -1 to *only* support Java 7 in both Lucene and Solr. This is way to early.
>
> Java 7 is not yet released to the public end user, you can only g
Sorry, I misunderstood the original question...
-1 to *only* support Java 7 in both Lucene and Solr. This is way to early.
Java 7 is not yet released to the public end user, you can only get it as
"developer" resource, not on official end-user java download triggered e.g.
from the browser on mi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
> whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Lucene's purpose is to be a dependency for other projects, and that
would force all those pr
I see no problem in supporting Java 7. All tests run with Java 7, both 3.x and
trunk. I have a production instance of Lucene running with Java 7. The only
requirement is u1.
Lucene 3.5 was the first version not only compiling against Java 7 worked, but
also running all tests. The code already m
Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Erick
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> So close!
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-607769
Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of
whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7.
Erick
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> So close!
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-607769
So close!
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-6077692575
Dawid
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
