that people enable this with buggy logging configs.
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adrien Grand
>> Sent: Tuesday, December
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Grand
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:57 AM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.11.1 release
>
> Jan, if you remember the names of the tests that fail, can you
> annotate them with @BadApple so that they will not fail
Yes, please use 2.16.
Uwe
Am 14. Dezember 2021 00:00:49 UTC schrieb Mike Drob :
>There's been a log4j 2.16 release as well, should we pick that one up if
>your next attempt fails?
>
>https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.16.0
>
>On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 5:58 PM Jan Høydahl
Jan, if you remember the names of the tests that fail, can you
annotate them with @BadApple so that they will not fail when building
new RCs or future 8.11 patch releases?
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:41 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> I've had one run which passed tests, but then it failed signing due
I've had one run which passed tests, but then it failed signing due to me using
Ant 1.10. After that I had 2 runs with one test failure each.. This beast is
hard to please.
Will continue with Ant 1.9 until there is a passing build and then announce RC1.
Jan
> 14. des. 2021 kl. 01:08 skrev Jan
+1
Feel free to merge it if you feel an itch. Then I'll git pull before next build
attempt.
Jan
> 14. des. 2021 kl. 01:00 skrev Mike Drob :
>
> There's been a log4j 2.16 release as well, should we pick that one up if your
> next attempt fails?
>
>
There's been a log4j 2.16 release as well, should we pick that one up if
your next attempt fails?
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.16.0
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 5:58 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Currently running 4th attempt at making buildAndPushRelease.py happy.
> Always
Currently running 4th attempt at making buildAndPushRelease.py happy. Always
different tests failing...
Jan
> 13. des. 2021 kl. 21:00 skrev David Smiley :
>
> Looks good; thanks Jan!
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
Looks good; thanks Jan!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Including Lucene dev as well.
>
> As I see no Lucene level bug fixes for 8.11.1, I have prepared an "empty"
> release
Including Lucene dev as well.
As I see no Lucene level bug fixes for 8.11.1, I have prepared an "empty"
release announcement:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote8_11_1
Please edit as you see fit.
The Solr announcement is slightly updated, proof-read welcome
agreed! thanks for stepping up to be the RM Jan ;-)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:05 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Solr has 13 bug fixes lined up in branch_8_11 already. Lucene has no changes.
> Now that Lucene 9.0 is out the door (congrats!), let's do the 8.11.1 release.
>
> I volunteer as RM
Hi,
Solr has 13 bug fixes lined up in branch_8_11 already. Lucene has no changes.
Now that Lucene 9.0 is out the door (congrats!), let's do the 8.11.1 release.
I volunteer as RM and propose a first RC on Monday 13th. That should allow some
time to merge any last bug fixes both for Lucene and
12 matches
Mail list logo
