*From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:07 AM
*To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Noble, I still see the Release Documentation section here
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html empty.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Noble, I still see the Release Documentation section here
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html empty.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have removed the repeated CHANGES.txt references. It is there only
: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Thanks Uwe ,
fixed
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
wrote:
http://lucene.staging.apache.org/ = NOW looks OK, 10 mins ago, the
last Solr item was on wrong line
http://lucene.staging.apache.org/core/corenews.html = this one
63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:39 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Thanks Uwe ,
fixed
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54
I'm planning to announce the release of Lucene Solr 5.3 .
Please check the site http://lucene.staging.apache.org/
--Noble
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Noble, FYI, I had already gone to bed when you sent this email, but at that
point, it had been
: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 4:47 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
I'm planning to announce the release of Lucene Solr 5.3 .
Please check the site http://lucene.staging.apache.org/
--Noble
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Steve Rowe
*) In built security plugins = Built-in? In fact, I am confused
reading that item and the next one. Are they the same or different?
Items #1 and #2 are different
Built-in or in-built ? I'm not sure either
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
Under
Under Solr highlights:
*) In built security plugins = Built-in? In fact, I am confused
reading that item and the next one. Are they the same or different?
*) The MoreLikeThis QParser mlt = ... extra mlt?
*) (Added?) Scoring mode for query-time join and block join.
*) (Added? language-neutral?)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Lucene News (on Lucene sub page)
completely unformatted
which page exactly
others fixed. Actually I was planning to release later that's why I kept it
25
August ;)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Homepage:
Last item
, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:12 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Lucene News (on Lucene sub page)
completely unformatted
which page
Hi Noble,
On all three news pages, you have the announcement date at 25 August (tomorrow
in the US, Europe and India). If you’re going to announce shortly (within the
next 3.5 hours, when the date will advance for you in India), those should be
24 August. (Along the same lines, the dates on
...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 4:47 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
I'm planning to announce the release of Lucene Solr 5.3 .
Please check the site http://lucene.staging.apache.org
Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:12 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Lucene News (on Lucene sub page)
completely unformatted
which page exactly
others fixed. Actually I was planning to release later that's why I
kept it 25
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:39 PM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Thanks Uwe ,
fixed
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
http://lucene.staging.apache.org
Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Thanks Uwe ,
fixed
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
http://lucene.staging.apache.org/ = NOW looks OK, 10 mins ago, the
last Solr item was on wrong line
http://lucene.staging.apache.org/core/corenews.html
[mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 5:42 AM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Thanks everyone.
We now have enough votes for the RC2 to be released.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee
Noble, FYI, I had already gone to bed when you sent this email, but at that
point, it had been significantly less than 72 hours from the time you sent out
the original RC2 VOTE email.
There are three conditions required for a release VOTE to succeed:
1. At least 72 hours must have passed
...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:49 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Smoked with Java 7 AND Java 8:
Java 1.7 JAVA_HOME=/home/thetaphi/jdk1.7.0_80
Java 1.8 JAVA_HOME
+1
-Yonik
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.0-RC2-rev1696229
You can run the
Thanks everyone.
We now have enough votes for the RC2 to be released.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-Yonik
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:02:40.331020]
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer,
oops , I shall wait
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't we supposed to wait for 72 hours after a RC has been uploaded
before publishing?[1]
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Publishing
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul
Sorry, the vote has not yet passed.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
Aren't we supposed to wait for 72 hours after a RC has been uploaded
before publishing?[1]
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Publishing
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
I shall
+1
SUCCESS! [0:51:02.991482]
- Mark
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
I found a typo in the changelog that looks like my sister is a popular
singer but I don't think it's worth a respin. :-)
Also Elasticsearch looks happy with this RC.
+1 SUCCESS!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:49 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Smoked with Java 7
Smoked with Java 7 AND Java 8:
Java 1.7 JAVA_HOME=/home/thetaphi/jdk1.7.0_80
Java 1.8 JAVA_HOME=/home/thetaphi/jdk1.8.0_51
SUCCESS! [3:00:31.633551]
(most of the time it was downloading Maven Artifacts...)
I also checked the artifacts on Windows 7, unzipped to Desktop with whitespace
in my
I found a typo in the changelog that looks like my sister is a popular
singer but I don't think it's worth a respin. :-)
Also Elasticsearch looks happy with this RC.
+1 SUCCESS! [1:00:50.650985]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [0:50:19.326227]
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:54:57.008126]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net
wrote:
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:02:40.331020]
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
SUCCESS! 2:38:50.471225
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Timothy Potter thelabd...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [1:31:49.158753] tested Java 7 8
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs
+1
SUCCESS! [1:31:49.158753] tested Java 7 8
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Aug 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
+1
SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Aug 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:54:57.008126]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net
wrote:
+1
Smoke tester is happy with both Java 7 8:
SUCCESS! [1:18:46.151515]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for the
+1
Tested with both Java7 and Java8.
SUCCESS! [0:57:25.409123]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
+1
Smoke tester is happy with both Java 7 8:
SUCCESS! [1:18:46.151515]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Noble Paul noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
36 matches
Mail list logo