Robert:
It's much better to ask usage questions like this on the user's list
rather than in a
comment on a JIRA, the user's list gets seen by a much wider audience. See
the solr-user section here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
Quick answers:
1> you're better off chunking things up
Harley,
I don't really think this is the same thing. Although I think it is
poor form to name it the same, these are 2 different caches. I am
still not sure what increasing the custom cache does. I looked at the
code and it is not clear. I did confirm that this seems t be happening
NOT on commit,
I updated the Spatial wiki
Sent from my Mobile device
720-256-8076
On Mar 13, 2012, at 8:31 AM, "David Smiley (Commented) (JIRA)"
wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228408#
Be brave, just go for building it ...
It's actually surprisingly easy.
Start here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
you should be able to get this all running (assuming
you have svn, ant and a jdk) in about 15 minutes,
exclusive of the checkout time. I was amazed first
time I tried i
Srikanth,
Have you tried to do a basic profiling or sampling? Just take a few thread
dumps by jstack. If the code is so greedy for CPU, you'll have it in a
stack.
Regards
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Srikanth Kallurkar (Commented) (JIRA) <
j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.ap
___
From: William Bell [billnb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:19 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Chris Male; yo...@lucidimagination.com
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2155) Geospatial search using geohash
prefixes
Maybe I am too close
Maybe I am too close to this issue and not looking at global
implications like you are
SOLR-2155 seems fairly close to "good to go". There are a couple open
issues that David Smiley has been asking for input on.
I would recommend we answer those questions, and commit it. Then we
can look at mo
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:03 PM, Chris Male wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It really should say: Added Geospatial Support, as it was non-existent in
> Solr before.
>
> Most of the work for adding in spatial in Solr consisted of improving things
> in Solr to make it easy to leverage the one spatial feature we r
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
> >>> support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
> >>> versus adding it where it bel
Hi,
It really should say: Added Geospatial Support, as it was non-existent in
> Solr before.
>
> Most of the work for adding in spatial in Solr consisted of improving
> things in Solr to make it easy to leverage the one spatial feature we really
> added: distance based functions and parsing suppor
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>>
>>> No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
>>> support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
>>> versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
>>
>> There need not be any linkag
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>>
>>> No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
>>> support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
>>> versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
>>
>> There need not be any linkag
>>
>> No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
>> support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
>> versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?
>
> There need not be any linkage to lucene to improve a Solr feature.
> If you disagree, we
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
I don't really think things like this (queries etc) shoul
FYI, I'm working on revamping lucene spatial in general
https://lucene-spatial-playground.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/
These are just sketch APIs for now, but i hope to get them cleaned up
and contributed soon.
The proposal will be for 3 packages i
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>>
>> I disagree strongly with the sentime
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>
> I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
> Everything developed in
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>>
>> I disagree strongly with the sentimen
>
> > I started on tier support, but dropped it when I realized it was broken
> beyond repair.
I did no know one could break >code< beyond repair
Nicolas
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>
> I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
> Everything developed in
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>>
>> I disagree strongly with the sentimen
On Mar 26, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
>
> I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
> Everything developed in/f
On Mar 26, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Not really related to this issue, so moving to dev@...
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>[
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr
I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
Everything developed in/for lucene need not be exported to Solr immediately.
Everythi
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Not really related to this issue, so moving to dev@...
>
> On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
Not really related to this issue, so moving to dev@...
On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011616#comment-13011616
> ]
>
> Ro
26 matches
Mail list logo
