skog [goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 10:58 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
www.openldap.org
Haven't used it. Here's the License:
http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html
karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
> Looking ar
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:02 PM
To: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org; lucene-...@apache.org;
connectors-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Hi Peter,
I just committed the promised changes to the LCF Solr output connector.
ACL metadata will now b
, April 29, 2010 11:04 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Yes, your point about filters vs queries is a good one. I do need to move the
fq building to the Lucene model.
It's true that in the case of, say, NTFS, there is already access control
bui
ver your data source is. There are certainly a number of
> "repositories" with this characteristic, though - the web, rss feeds, file
> systems, etc.
>
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:
From: ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:56 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Hi Karl,
- There's a significant extra load on the repository, because every search
result has
lto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:35 AM
> *To:* connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org
> *Cc:* dev@lucene.apache.org; connectors-...@incubator.apache.org;
> lucene-...@apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
>
>
pache.org; connectors-...@incubator.apache.org;
lucene-...@apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Hi Karl,
I guess it comes down to - any solution is ultimately going to place access
control on a search and not on data, so there isn't much to be gained by
binding the ac
of room for different flavors of solution, so
> please by all means go ahead and propose your take on it!
>
> Karl
>
>
> From: ext Peter Sturge [peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:07 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: connectors-
ke on it!
Karl
From: ext Peter Sturge [peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:07 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org; connectors-...@incubator.apache.org;
lucene-...@apache.org
Subject: Re: F
Hi Karl,
I wasn't trying to to put pay to your design proposal, really the opposite -
to highlight requirements that have found to be necessary for
customers/users, and to hopefully get the best functionality for the
product. If you feel I've put you out on any of the issues raised, then I
apologi
ents welcome...
Karl
From: Wright Karl (Nokia-S/Cambridge)
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:20 AM
To: connectors-...@incubator.apache.org; dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org; lucene-...@apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: Solr and LCF se
e.org; connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org;
lucene-...@apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Hi Karl,
See inline...
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:57 PM, wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> The authority connectors don't perform authentication at this time.
> In fact, LCF
ou, so perhaps you can describe how you expect a user to interact with
your system, so I can understand your design issues.
Thanks,
Karl
-----Original Message-
From: ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
not expecting time miracles here, so don't
> sweat the schedule.
>
>
> Karl
>
>
> ________________
> From: ext Peter Sturge [peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:27 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
d.
I'll be doing more research as time permits...
Karl
From: Wright Karl (Nokia-S/Cambridge)
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:02 PM
To: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org; lucene-...@apache.org;
connectors-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW:
entially be multiple values for each of these two
> fields.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:51 PM
>
> *To:* connectors-u...@incubator.apa
values for each of these two
fields.
Hope this helps,
Karl
From: ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:51 PM
To: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
Hi Karl,
Thanks
it is trivial for me to make that happen.
Does this sound plausible to you?
Karl
From: ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 5:41 PM
To: connectors-u...@incubator.apache.org; dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW:
tication, which needs a
> solution.
>
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:44 AM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
&g
...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:44 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
If you want to do this completely within Solr, have a look at:
SOLR-1834 and SOLR-1872. These use a SearchComponent plugin for Solr.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr
If you want to do this completely within Solr, have a look at:
SOLR-1834 and SOLR-1872. These use a SearchComponent plugin for Solr.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
> FYI
>
> --
> *From:* Wright Karl (Nokia-S/Cambridge)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, Ap
21 matches
Mail list logo
