Both merged in the lucene_solr_4_0 Branch :)
On Monday, October 1, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was
introduced after the beta release from what I can tell)
The only other things i see listed as bugs are
NOTE: vote stays open until Tuesday (since it was over a weekend).
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and
packaging and so on. This will pay off in
Hi,
-1 to release those artifacts!
First the good thing: I ran smoketester on an Ubuntu 12.04.1 Server with 2
older Opteron CPUs (NUMA), passed perfectly (1.6.0_33 and 1.7.0_07). I also
inspected the artifacts and had a look at JavaDocs. I found some typos in
READMEs, but all not very
Lets fix this stuff. I don't like this sizeInBytes double-counting!
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
-1 to release those artifacts!
First the good thing: I ran smoketester on an Ubuntu 12.04.1 Server with 2
older Opteron CPUs (NUMA), passed
Does this mean a re-spin?
I have a low-risk but high impact (in terms of features) bug-fix I would
like to get in to 4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
but I did not want to put the breaks on any release that was being voted on.
~ David
-
Author:
Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was
introduced after the beta release from what I can tell)
The only other things i see listed as bugs are
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3637 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3560
If these things are
Sorry, i had this backwards: if it makes 4.0 it needs no CHANGES entry :)
If it doesnt, then it should have one for 4.1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was
introduced after the beta release
I just got it committed to the 4.0 release branch, after I ran tests.
I didn't add a CHANGES.txt entry because this is basically a bug to an
existing entry that is already post-beta (SOLR-3304).
~ David
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View
: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
VOTE: +1 for the following artifacts (sha1)...
378a1077b9b8806e8a972e8b56722696c07c1078 *apache-solr-4.0.0-src.tgz
787c41de747053bd22dfbb24ebbd1a6184038eef *apache-solr-4.0.0.tgz
5c7d5143dbe02b430a5dd0243385f55b928f1f40
+1 smoketested + tested in 4.0 apps. Looks good to me!
simon
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
Smoke test succeeded on MacOSX 10.7, plus tested in various running projects
and everything seems fine.
one thing I noticed is :
no package
Smoke test passed successfully on my computer (Ubuntu 12.04.1 , locale=fr_FR).
Good that lucene-core JAR now is 2.0 MB (vs. 2.3 in 4.0-BETA).
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
+1
Tested on Ubuntu 12.01 i386, Java 1.7
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and
packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future!
+1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and
packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future!
I'm continuously indexing Japanese Wikipedia while introducing a constant query
load of approx. 200 queries per second using unique Japanese terms with
highlighting turned on. I'm running Mac OS X 10.8.2 and Java 1.6.0_35. Things
are looking good.
+1
Thanks again for being release manager,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Christian Moen c...@atilika.com wrote:
Thanks again for being release manager, Robert!
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Smoke test passes on my machine, I've been doing other checks and
verification, and I'm happy with the results.
+1
- Mark
On 09/27/2012 03:15 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and
packaging
+1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and
packaging and
+1 smoke tester is also happy on my machine.
Martijn
On 27 September 2012 21:16, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
+1: smoker admitted SUCCESS! on Win7+Cygwin
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:16 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1
By the way, thanks
Smoke test succeeded on MacOSX 10.7, plus tested in various running
projects and everything seems fine.
one thing I noticed is :
no package description (missing package.html in src?)
for most of the Solr source code therefore we should add those
package(-info).html for the javadoc.
However I don't
20 matches
Mail list logo
