On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
I'm looking into this now - I think it's just a bad test, expecting a
certain order where order is not guaranteed.
Yeah, that should be it (hopefully). Just had to specify that the top
level grouped was unordered.
: Yeah, that should be it (hopefully). Just had to specify that the top
: level grouped was unordered.
FWIW: i think what happend here is that in the past, the test only ever
generated a single value in the grouped block -- and i recently modified
the test to start generating multiple groups.
