Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Robert Muir
This seems like a serious problem: something is really broken with the build? I setup a jenkins job to run this in a loop against the 4.6 branch. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote: Build:

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Steve Rowe
Robert, I chatted with Uwe on IRC about it earlier today - this is a permgen OOM - he thinks the issue is that Groovy is being loaded multiple times in order to define the lucene.javadoc.url - the LUCENE-5322 changes I backported to branch_4x yesterday are the cause. I did not backport

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Robert Muir
oh i see. you already have a patch or you need help? Ill keep the smoketest-loop against 4.6 running just in case, because this jenkins job runs rarely at builds.apache.org but is really useful at times like this :) On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Robert,

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Steve Rowe
I have a patch I’m testing now, thanks. I agree, it is useful to have more testing around a release. Looks like you should be running your smoketest-looper with java 6 instead of java 7 - build #3 is complaining about jar metadata. Steve On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Robert Muir

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Robert Muir
I set JAVA_HOME to a 1.6 compiler, but this still trips: I actually think something is seriously broken with the build? I set this up because Simon was trying to make a RC manually and pinged me about wrong compiler being used, OOMs, etc. [lucene-solr-46-smoker] $ ant

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Robert Muir
This isn't how its supposed to work though :) JAVA_HOME should work. I'm 99% positive if i switch my exact same jenkins task to a previous release branch it will pass. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I don’t think it’s JAVA_HOME that’s consulted to produce

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Steve Rowe
I don’t think it’s JAVA_HOME that’s consulted to produce the fake release, but rather the first javac on the PATH. (That’s true for a real release too of course.) So you should do $ JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_37 PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH ant -DJAVA7_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.7.0_25

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Steve Rowe
I can't find anywhere in the build that looks up JAVA_HOME (other than smokeTestRelease.py) - through what mechanism should a JAVA_HOME sysprop affect which javac and javadoc binaries are used to build a release? On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: This isn't how

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x - Build # 125 - Failure

2013-11-13 Thread Robert Muir
JAVA_HOME still works: its what the ant 'javac' target uses. My problem was related to jenkins only, and I think Uwe already logged in and fixed it. Sorry for the noise. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I can't find anywhere in the build that looks up