gt;
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
>> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
>>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:13 AM
>>
> To: Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [Poss
..@mikemccandless.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:13 AM
> > To: Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Possibly spoofed] Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > Since we are still finding a number of bad bu
ginal Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:13 AM
> To: Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Possibly spoofed] Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Sinc
Hi Nick,
Since we are still finding a number of bad bugs (!!) in the new
dimensional points, e.g. equals was broken on the range query, the set
query for InetAddress didn't work, exceptions on merging sparse
fields, etc., and since at least e.g. Rob is working hard on cutting
over legacy numerics
This is a heads up that I will be starting the release process no earlier
than 24 hours from now. Thanks to everyone in advance for their help during
this process.
- Nick
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Vanlerberghe, Luc <
luc.vanlerber...@bvdinfo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I added two JIRA
Hi,
I added two JIRA issues (Lucene:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7078, Solr:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8802 ) concerning Query classes that
are still mutable and should either become immutable, marked as
@lucene.experimental or get a comment why it’s not an
