>From IndexReader API javadoc:
There are two different types of IndexReaders:
{@link AtomicReader}: These indexes do not consist of several sub-readers,
they are atomic. They support retrieval of stored fields, doc values, terms,
and postings.
{@link CompositeReader}: Instances (like {@
On 16 February 2013 14:35, Robert Muir wrote:
>
> TermsEnum termsEnum = reader.terms("body").iterator(null);
> boolean found = termsEnum.seekExact(new BytesRef("dogs"), false);
> // pass 0, to not ask for frequencies
> DocsEnum docsEnum = termsEnum.docs(reader.getLiveDocs(
On 16 February 2013 14:35, Robert Muir wrote:
2. index them, but specify you won't ask for them in the DocsEnum: and
> just use that to iterate documents.
>
> TermsEnum termsEnum = reader.terms("body").iterator(null);
> boolean found = termsEnum.seekExact(new BytesRef("dogs"), false);
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Sebastiano Vigna wrote:
>
> I never asked for that. It looks like you're entirely missing my point.
> Which is to do a fair benchmark between radically different implementations
> of an index structure.
"It would also be important for me to force PForDelta everywh
On 16 February 2013 13:19, Robert Muir wrote:
I think you are missing my point: this interleaving is part of the
> whole design of this postings format. You can't just turn it off and
> force it to be always FOR: or you would need a new postings format
>
I never asked for that. It looks like you
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Sebastiano Vigna wrote:
> On 16 February 2013 11:45, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> But forcing that wouldn't be testing the 4.1 index format, it would be
>> something else (something not interesting).
>
>
> Do you mind if I have my own share of knowledge and have my ide
On 16 February 2013 11:45, Robert Muir wrote:
> But forcing that wouldn't be testing the 4.1 index format, it would be
> something else (something not interesting).
>
Do you mind if I have my own share of knowledge and have my idea about
interesting benchmarks? :)
You didn't answer, but the und
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Sebastiano Vigna wrote:
> I'd like to redo the benchmarks published on MG4J's home page with Lucene
> 4.1. However, for this I'd need to know whether when using PForDelta coding
> the counts (a.k.a. within-document frequencies) are stored interleaved with
> the
